Giulio Zeppieri vs Antoine Escoffier — Rovereto CH Quarter-final

Rovereto CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Giulio Zeppieri
ITA3
Giulio Zeppieri
#218ATP
1622ELO
1589Hard ELO
$70kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
FRA7
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Zeppieri G.
2-6 6-3 6-2
Escoffier A.
Zeppieri G.
2662
Escoffier A.
6321

Giulio Zeppieri defeated Antoine Escoffier 2-6 6-3 6-2 in the Rovereto CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zeppieri G.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Escoffier A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zeppieri G.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zeppieri G.Escoffier A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
65%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.0
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (178 vs 163). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zeppieri G.Escoffier A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
55
10
Break points saved·Dominant
95
68
Break points won·Clear edge
39
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
68
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zeppieri G.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Escoffier A.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.2+176 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Hard Elo 1413
7.3Overall Elo 1622
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1436
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
6.5
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
1.9
4.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Stricker D.[2]
Zeppieri G.[3]
7-686-2
Semi-finals
Stricker D.[2]
Onclin G.
6-37-63
Zeppieri G.[3]
Uchida K.[6]
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Stricker D.[2]
Moro Canas A.
6-44-66-0
Zeppieri G.[3]
Escoffier A.[7]
2-66-36-2
Uchida K.[6]
Rodionov J.[1]
7-662-66-3
Onclin G.
Kolar Z.[4]
6-36-3
R16
Moro Canas A.
De Loore J.[8]
6-15-77-5
Kolar Z.[4]
Donskoy E.
6-47-5
Onclin G.
Serafini M.
6-42-67-5
Escoffier A.[7]
Copil M.
6-17-5
Uchida K.[6]
Gojowczyk P.
1-66-17-61
Stricker D.[2]
Bourgue M.
6-46-3
Rodionov J.[1]
Choinski J.
6-22-66-4
Zeppieri G.[3]
Broom C.
4-66-16-2
R32
Donskoy E.
Furness E.
6-746-36-4
Broom C.
Arnaboldi A.
6-24-0
Uchida K.[6]
Jianu F.
6-43-1
Onclin G.
Rosol L.
6-17-60
Stricker D.[2]
Poljicak M.
3-67-56-1
Choinski J.
Gengel M.
6-16-4
Bourgue M.
Geerts M.
6-756-46-2
Moro Canas A.
Yunchaokete B.
6-44-66-2
De Loore J.[8]
Travaglia S.
7-666-4
Kolar Z.[4]
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Escoffier A.[7]
Collignon R.
4-67-57-63
Copil M.
Zuk K.
6-757-56-4
Zeppieri G.[3]
Ferrari G.
6-16-3
Gojowczyk P.
Valkusz M.
6-46-4
Serafini M.
Gigante M.
6-42-66-4
Rodionov J.[1]
Tu L.
6-36-3