Benoit Paire vs Ernesto Escobedo — Monterrey CH Round of 32

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Benoit Paire
#1096ATP
1362ELO
1336Hard ELO
37 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
MEX
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
Paire B.
2-6 6-2 6-2
Escobedo E.
Paire B.
2662
Escobedo E.
6221

Benoit Paire defeated Ernesto Escobedo 2-6 6-2 6-2 in the Monterrey CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paire B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Escobedo E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Paire B.

Serve advantage — Escobedo E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Paire B.Escobedo E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
52%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
43%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.8
4.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (147 vs 65). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paire B.Escobedo E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
28
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
84
Break points won·Clear edge
31
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
53
16
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
58
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Paire B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Escobedo E.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[6]
Gojo B.
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Borges N.[6]
Krueger M.
7-637-63
Gojo B.
Watanuki Y.[8]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.
Tomic B.
6-42-1
Borges N.[6]
Altmaier D.[4]
7-626-4
Gojo B.
Kovacevic A.
7-653-66-2
Watanuki Y.[8]
Kudla D.[3]
3-67-636-2
R16
Krueger M.
Andreozzi G.
6-32-1
Tomic B.
Gomez E.[2]
4-66-47-64
Kudla D.[3]
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Marterer M.
7-616-3
Borges N.[6]
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Watanuki Y.[8]
Paire B.
7-626-1
Gojo B.
Daniel T.[7]
6-26-4
Kovacevic A.
Mejia N.
6-36-2
R32
Zhu E.
Wu T.
7-625-76-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Holt B.
7-646-3
Gomez E.[2]
Yevseyev D.
7-666-4
Tomic B.
Ficovich J.
7-636-1
Borges N.[6]
Klahn B.
6-26-2
Mejia N.
Mansouri S.
6-41-66-3
Marterer M.
Elias G.
6-36-4
Gojo B.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-37-63
Kovacevic A.
Mannarino A.[1]
7-57-64
Chappell N.
Flores J.
6-36-2
Paire B.
Escobedo E.
2-66-26-2
Watanuki Y.[8]
Van Deinse J.
6-06-1
Andreozzi G.
Eubanks C.[5]
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Diez S.
6-45-76-4
Daniel T.[7]
Johnson S.
6-43-66-3
Kudla D.[3]
Bellucci M.
6-26-4