Jason Jung vs S D Prajwal Dev — Bengaluru CH Round of 32

Bengaluru CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
IND
S D Prajwal Dev
#628ATP
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
Jung J.
6-2 6-2
Dev S.
Jung J.
662
Dev S.
220

Jason Jung defeated S D Prajwal Dev 6-2 6-2 in the Bengaluru CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jung J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Dev S.

Dev S.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Serve advantage — Jung J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jung J.Dev S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (74 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jung J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Dev S.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 371 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jung J.Dev S.
Freshness·
78
—

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.[2]
3-67-57-65
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Medjedovic H.
6-25-77-64
Duckworth J.[2]
Mccabe J.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Kuzmanov D.[8]
6-46-1
Mccabe J.
Mayot H.
6-37-64
Medjedovic H.
Tseng C.[1]
6-16-2
Purcell M.
Nardi L.[5]
6-26-0
R16
Mayot H.
Peniston R.[3]
7-656-0
Tseng C.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-25-77-64
Duckworth J.[2]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-16-2
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.
Polmans M.
7-57-5
Nardi L.[5]
Jung J.
7-55-76-2
Purcell M.
Nagal S.
4-66-36-3
Medjedovic H.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-35-76-4
R32
Polmans M.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-2
Moreno De Alboran N.
Svrcina D.[7]
7-56-2
Nardi L.[5]
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Uchiyama Y.
6-746-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Neuchrist M.
3-67-56-2
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Milojevic N.
6-46-1
Peniston R.[3]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Mayot H.
Sweeny D.
3-66-16-4
Mccabe J.
Giustino L.
6-27-63
Purcell M.
Ofner S.[4]
7-663-66-3
Medjedovic H.
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-4
Tseng C.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Noguchi R.
7-636-1
Jung J.
Dev S.
6-26-2
Hsu Y.
Borg L.
6-26-3
Nagal S.
Ly N.
7-635-76-4