Borna Gojo vs Taro Daniel — Monterrey CH Round of 16

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
Taro Daniel
JPN7
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
Gojo B.
6-2 6-4
Daniel T.
Gojo B.
662
Daniel T.
240

Borna Gojo defeated Taro Daniel 6-2 6-4 in the Monterrey CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Daniel T.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.6
4.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Daniel T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
42
Break points saved·Even
95
93
Break points won·Dominant
10
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
16
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
73
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Daniel T.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+150 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Hard Elo 1512
7.3Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1567
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.7
Surface form
3.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
9.3
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Daniel T.
Freshness·Dominant
100
59

Gojo B.: 20 days rest · Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[6]
Gojo B.
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Borges N.[6]
Krueger M.
7-637-63
Gojo B.
Watanuki Y.[8]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.
Tomic B.
6-42-1
Borges N.[6]
Altmaier D.[4]
7-626-4
Gojo B.
Kovacevic A.
7-653-66-2
Watanuki Y.[8]
Kudla D.[3]
3-67-636-2
R16
Krueger M.
Andreozzi G.
6-32-1
Tomic B.
Gomez E.[2]
4-66-47-64
Kudla D.[3]
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Marterer M.
7-616-3
Borges N.[6]
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Watanuki Y.[8]
Paire B.
7-626-1
Gojo B.
Daniel T.[7]
6-26-4
Kovacevic A.
Mejia N.
6-36-2
R32
Zhu E.
Wu T.
7-625-76-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Holt B.
7-646-3
Gomez E.[2]
Yevseyev D.
7-666-4
Tomic B.
Ficovich J.
7-636-1
Borges N.[6]
Klahn B.
6-26-2
Mejia N.
Mansouri S.
6-41-66-3
Marterer M.
Elias G.
6-36-4
Gojo B.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-37-63
Kovacevic A.
Mannarino A.[1]
7-57-64
Chappell N.
Flores J.
6-36-2
Paire B.
Escobedo E.
2-66-26-2
Watanuki Y.[8]
Van Deinse J.
6-06-1
Andreozzi G.
Eubanks C.[5]
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Diez S.
6-45-76-4
Daniel T.[7]
Johnson S.
6-43-66-3
Kudla D.[3]
Bellucci M.
6-26-4