Gabriel Decamps vs Daniel Cukierman — Rome GA CH Round of 32
Rome GA CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
4.2
Surface form2.2
0.0
Win streak0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Decamps G.
662
Cukierman D.
120
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form65%1st serve in+5%60%
60%1st serve points won+6%66%
48%2nd serve points won+4%44%
56%Service points won+1%57%
48%Return points won+10%38%
55%Break points saved+3%52%
1.3Aces / match+1.42.7
4Double faults / match+1.15.1
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (4 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Svajda Z.
Ejupovic E.
6-13-66-3
Thompson J.[1]
Gray A.
6-46-2
Michelsen A.
Leshem E.
7-56-3
Hong S.[8]
Kodat T.
4-66-36-4
R16
Ejupovic E.
Harrison R.
3-67-656-2
Gray A.
Kypson P.
7-636-3
Svajda Z.
Vukic A.[3]
6-36-3
Thompson J.[1]
Squire H.
6-46-1
Hong S.[8]
Decamps G.
6-16-0
Leshem E.
Ponwith N.
6-36-2
Kodat T.
Shimabukuro S.
6-43-67-5
Michelsen A.
Moraing M.
6-743-1
R32
Kodat T.
Couacaud E.[4]
6-46-3
Vukic A.[3]
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1
Thompson J.[1]
Dougaz A.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.
Koepfer D.[7]
6-36-1
Ponwith N.
Hijikata R.[2]
6-46-756-3
Ejupovic E.
Sandgren T.[6]
6-43-2
Kypson P.
Smith K.
6-17-64
Shimabukuro S.
Fanselow S.
2-66-36-3
Harrison R.
Marchenko I.
6-33-66-3
Gray A.
Galarneau A.[5]
6-46-4
Leshem E.
Mochizuki S.
6-746-36-2
Svajda Z.
Wong C.
6-36-1
Decamps G.
Cukierman D.
6-16-2
Squire H.
Rincon D.
6-46-2
Moraing M.
Harrison C.
1-66-46-3