Denis Kudla vs Nick Chappell — Monterrey CH Round of 16

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA3
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Kudla D.
6-3 6-4
Chappell N.
Kudla D.
662
Chappell N.
340

Denis Kudla defeated Nick Chappell 6-3 6-4 in the Monterrey CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Denis Kudla closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Chappell N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Serve advantage — Kudla D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Chappell N.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (101 vs 57). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Chappell N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
0
Break points saved·Dominant
90
29
Break points won·Slight edge
19
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
3
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
30
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Chappell N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
2.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Borges N.[6]
Gojo B.
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Borges N.[6]
Krueger M.
7-637-63
Gojo B.
Watanuki Y.[8]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.
Tomic B.
6-42-1
Borges N.[6]
Altmaier D.[4]
7-626-4
Gojo B.
Kovacevic A.
7-653-66-2
Watanuki Y.[8]
Kudla D.[3]
3-67-636-2
R16
Krueger M.
Andreozzi G.
6-32-1
Tomic B.
Gomez E.[2]
4-66-47-64
Kudla D.[3]
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Marterer M.
7-616-3
Borges N.[6]
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Watanuki Y.[8]
Paire B.
7-626-1
Gojo B.
Daniel T.[7]
6-26-4
Kovacevic A.
Mejia N.
6-36-2
R32
Zhu E.
Wu T.
7-625-76-4
Altmaier D.[4]
Holt B.
7-646-3
Gomez E.[2]
Yevseyev D.
7-666-4
Tomic B.
Ficovich J.
7-636-1
Borges N.[6]
Klahn B.
6-26-2
Mejia N.
Mansouri S.
6-41-66-3
Marterer M.
Elias G.
6-36-4
Gojo B.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-37-63
Kovacevic A.
Mannarino A.[1]
7-57-64
Chappell N.
Flores J.
6-36-2
Paire B.
Escobedo E.
2-66-26-2
Watanuki Y.[8]
Van Deinse J.
6-06-1
Andreozzi G.
Eubanks C.[5]
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Diez S.
6-45-76-4
Daniel T.[7]
Johnson S.
6-43-66-3
Kudla D.[3]
Bellucci M.
6-26-4