Mathias Bourgue vs Michael Geerts — Rovereto CH Round of 32

Rovereto CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Mathias Bourgue
#2057ATP
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Bourgue M.
6-7 6-4 6-2
Geerts M.
Bourgue M.
65662
Geerts M.
77421

Mathias Bourgue defeated Michael Geerts 6-7 6-4 6-2 in the Rovereto CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bourgue M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bourgue M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bourgue M.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
4.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (101 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bourgue M.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
38
9
Break points saved·Even
81
82
Break points won·Even
2
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
73
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
28
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bourgue M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Geerts M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
3.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Stricker D.[2]
Zeppieri G.[3]
7-686-2
Semi-finals
Stricker D.[2]
Onclin G.
6-37-63
Zeppieri G.[3]
Uchida K.[6]
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Stricker D.[2]
Moro Canas A.
6-44-66-0
Zeppieri G.[3]
Escoffier A.[7]
2-66-36-2
Uchida K.[6]
Rodionov J.[1]
7-662-66-3
Onclin G.
Kolar Z.[4]
6-36-3
R16
Moro Canas A.
De Loore J.[8]
6-15-77-5
Kolar Z.[4]
Donskoy E.
6-47-5
Onclin G.
Serafini M.
6-42-67-5
Escoffier A.[7]
Copil M.
6-17-5
Uchida K.[6]
Gojowczyk P.
1-66-17-61
Stricker D.[2]
Bourgue M.
6-46-3
Rodionov J.[1]
Choinski J.
6-22-66-4
Zeppieri G.[3]
Broom C.
4-66-16-2
R32
Donskoy E.
Furness E.
6-746-36-4
Broom C.
Arnaboldi A.
6-24-0
Uchida K.[6]
Jianu F.
6-43-1
Onclin G.
Rosol L.
6-17-60
Stricker D.[2]
Poljicak M.
3-67-56-1
Choinski J.
Gengel M.
6-16-4
Bourgue M.
Geerts M.
6-756-46-2
Moro Canas A.
Yunchaokete B.
6-44-66-2
De Loore J.[8]
Travaglia S.
7-666-4
Kolar Z.[4]
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Escoffier A.[7]
Collignon R.
4-67-57-63
Copil M.
Zuk K.
6-757-56-4
Zeppieri G.[3]
Ferrari G.
6-16-3
Gojowczyk P.
Valkusz M.
6-46-4
Serafini M.
Gigante M.
6-42-66-4
Rodionov J.[1]
Tu L.
6-36-3