Yu Hsiou Hsu vs Leo Borg — Bengaluru CH Round of 32

Bengaluru CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#210ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
SWE
Leo Borg
#534ATP
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLWL
Hsu Y.
6-2 6-3
Borg L.
Hsu Y.
662
Borg L.
230

Yu Hsiou Hsu defeated Leo Borg 6-2 6-3 in the Bengaluru CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hsu Y.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Borg L.

Borg L.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Serve advantage — Hsu Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hsu Y.Borg L.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (169 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hsu Y.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Borg L.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
0.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
8.9
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.
Duckworth J.[2]
3-67-57-65
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Medjedovic H.
6-25-77-64
Duckworth J.[2]
Mccabe J.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Kuzmanov D.[8]
6-46-1
Mccabe J.
Mayot H.
6-37-64
Medjedovic H.
Tseng C.[1]
6-16-2
Purcell M.
Nardi L.[5]
6-26-0
R16
Mayot H.
Peniston R.[3]
7-656-0
Tseng C.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-25-77-64
Duckworth J.[2]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-16-2
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.
Polmans M.
7-57-5
Nardi L.[5]
Jung J.
7-55-76-2
Purcell M.
Nagal S.
4-66-36-3
Medjedovic H.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-35-76-4
R32
Polmans M.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-2
Moreno De Alboran N.
Svrcina D.[7]
7-56-2
Nardi L.[5]
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Uchiyama Y.
6-746-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Neuchrist M.
3-67-56-2
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Milojevic N.
6-46-1
Peniston R.[3]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Mayot H.
Sweeny D.
3-66-16-4
Mccabe J.
Giustino L.
6-27-63
Purcell M.
Ofner S.[4]
7-663-66-3
Medjedovic H.
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-4
Tseng C.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Noguchi R.
7-636-1
Jung J.
Dev S.
6-26-2
Hsu Y.
Borg L.
6-26-3
Nagal S.
Ly N.
7-635-76-4