Jan Lennard Struff vs Tomas Machac — Manama CH Quarter-final

Manama CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jan Lennard Struff
GER
Jan Lennard Struff
#74ATP
1694ELO
1634Hard ELO
$492kYTD
$13MCAREER
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 February 2023
hard
Tomas Machac
CZE6
Tomas Machac
#49ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Struff J.
6-4 6-3
Machac T.
Struff J.
662
Machac T.
430

Jan Lennard Struff defeated Tomas Machac 6-4 6-3 in the Manama CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #49.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Struff J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Struff J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Struff J.Machac T.
36
Serve
30
40
Return
25

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Struff J.Machac T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.8
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (190 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Struff J.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
61
90
Break points saved·Even
99
98
Break points won·Dominant
21
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
68
94
Tiebreaks·Even
94
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Struff J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Machac T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Hard Elo 1634
Surface ELO
7.3+195 Hard Elo edge
3.1Overall Elo 1694
ELO gap
6.9Overall Elo 1866
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Struff J.Machac T.
Freshness·
59
—

Struff J.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 87 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Shelbayh A.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Struff J.
6-46-736-1
Shelbayh A.
Caruso S.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Popyrin A.[2]
6-37-65
Struff J.
Machac T.[6]
6-46-3
Caruso S.
Giustino L.
7-56-2
Shelbayh A.
Kubler J.[1]
6-25-77-62
R16
Giustino L.
Passaro F.[4]
7-56-3
Struff J.
Oconnell C.[3]
6-17-61
Popyrin A.[2]
Durasovic V.
1-66-16-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Muller A.
6-44-66-4
Machac T.[6]
Sinclair C.
6-06-2
Caruso S.
Gengel M.
6-16-2
Shelbayh A.
Kopriva V.
6-43-66-3
Kubler J.[1]
Michalski D.
6-36-3
R32
Gengel M.
Jianu F.
7-636-727-63
Oconnell C.[3]
Neuchrist M.
6-46-4
Muller A.
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-1
Machac T.[6]
Giannessi A.
6-22-66-2
Kopriva V.
Kotov P.[7]
6-26-1
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Erel Y.
7-56-1
Durasovic V.
Braynin A.
6-766-17-5
Popyrin A.[2]
Virtanen O.
7-56-2
Struff J.
Chepelev A.
6-26-2
Sinclair C.
Arnaboldi A.
7-632-66-3
Giustino L.
Safwat M.
6-46-4
Passaro F.[4]
Uchida K.
6-16-4
Shelbayh A.
Atlangeriev B.
6-26-3
Caruso S.
Arnaldi M.[5]
3-66-36-2
Kubler J.[1]
Travaglia S.
5-76-17-611