Petra Martic vs Alison Van Uytvanck — Linz Round of 16

Linz · WTA · Round of 16
CRO6
Petra Martic
#1014WTA
1673ELO
1633Hard ELO
35 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2023
hard
BEL
Alison Van Uytvanck
32 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLWL
Martic P.
6-4 6-7 7-6
Van Uytvanck A.
Martic P.
665772
Van Uytvanck A.
477631

Petra Martic defeated Alison Van Uytvanck 6-4 6-7 7-6 in the Linz round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Petra Martic came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Petra Martic extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-08-03PalermoR32clayPetra Martic6-0 6-3
2018-01-15Australian OpenR128hardPetra Martic7-6(5) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Martic P.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Van Uytvanck A.

Van Uytvanck A.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Martic P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Martic P.Van Uytvanck A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
39%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
54%
Return points won·Even
40%
44%
Break points saved·Even
56%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Martic P.Van Uytvanck A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
14
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
77
Break points won·Slight edge
66
55
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martic P.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Van Uytvanck A.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
8.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
-1°COvercast
Wind 3 km/hHumidity 63%

Draw

Final
Potapova A.[8]
Martic P.[6]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Potapova A.[8]
Vondrousova M.
6-16-746-3
Martic P.[6]
Sakkari M.[1]
3-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Vondrousova M.
Galfi D.
4-1
Martic P.[6]
Tauson C.
6-47-5
Potapova A.[8]
Friedsam A.
2-66-46-1
Sakkari M.[1]
Vekic D.[5]
6-37-68
R16
Tauson C.
Giorgi C.
1-66-36-4
Friedsam A.
Kalinina A.[4]
6-37-5
Vondrousova M.
Masarova R.
6-16-1
Potapova A.[8]
Niemeier J.
7-53-66-3
Vekic D.[5]
Brengle M.
6-36-1
Martic P.[6]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-46-757-63
Sakkari M.[1]
Gracheva V.
6-46-2
Galfi D.
Lys E.
6-43-66-3
R32
Potapova A.[8]
Bronzetti L.
2-66-36-4
Niemeier J.
Kenin S.
2-66-36-4
Kalinina A.[4]
Parks A.
6-27-5
Lys E.
Rakhimova K.
6-47-65
Vondrousova M.
Tomova V.
6-36-3
Masarova R.
Alexandrova E.[2]
4-66-17-66
Friedsam A.
Errani S.
6-26-4
Tauson C.
Begu I.[3]
6-16-2
Sakkari M.[1]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-17-66
Gracheva V.
Blinkova A.
7-57-5
Giorgi C.
Cristian J.
6-16-2
Van Uytvanck A.
Noskova L.
7-636-2
Vekic D.[5]
Korpatsch T.
7-646-1
Brengle M.
Grabher J.
7-626-2
Martic P.[6]
Bassols Ribera M.
6-17-5
Galfi D.
Pera B.[7]
6-27-65