Shelby Rogers vs Anett Kontaveit — Abu Dhabi Round of 16

Abu Dhabi · WTA · Round of 16
USA
Shelby Rogers
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 6 February 2023
hard
EST7
Anett Kontaveit
30 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Rogers S.
4-6 6-3 4-1
Kontaveit A.
Rogers S.
464–
Kontaveit A.
631–

Shelby Rogers advanced when Anett Kontaveit retired 4-6 6-3 4-1 in the Abu Dhabi round of 16. Shelby Rogers extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-02-08Australian OpenR32hardShelby Rogers6-4 6-3
2019-07-01WimbledonR128grassAnett Kontaveit6-0 3-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Rogers S.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kontaveit A.

Kontaveit A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rogers S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rogers S.Kontaveit A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
43%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
49%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
2.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (43 vs 11). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rogers S.Kontaveit A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
42
82
Break points saved·Even
86
85
Break points won·Slight edge
84
91
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
90
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
54
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rogers S.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kontaveit A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
3.7
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
22°CClear
Wind 3 km/hHumidity 62%

Draw

Final
Bencic B.[2]
Samsonova L.[8]
1-67-686-4
Semi-finals
Bencic B.[2]
Haddad Maia B.[6]
6-26-3
Samsonova L.[8]
Zheng Q.
6-41-66-4
Quarter-finals
Haddad Maia B.[6]
Rybakina E.[3]
3-66-36-2
Bencic B.[2]
Rogers S.
7-656-2
Samsonova L.[8]
Kudermetova V.[4]
6-36-3
Zheng Q.
Kasatkina D.[1]
6-16-2
R16
Zheng Q.
Ostapenko J.[5]
7-6106-1
Samsonova L.[8]
Krejcikova B.
7-57-66
Rogers S.
Kontaveit A.[7]
4-66-34-1
Bencic B.[2]
Kostyuk M.
6-47-5
Haddad Maia B.[6]
Putintseva Y.
6-46-757-64
Kudermetova V.[4]
Mertens E.
6-17-5
Rybakina E.[3]
Pliskova K.
6-46-2
Kasatkina D.[1]
Teichmann J.
1-66-06-2
R32
Kontaveit A.[7]
Zhang S.
4-67-646-4
Rogers S.
Fernandez L.
6-46-756-1
Kostyuk M.
Cirstea S.
6-21-66-2
Teichmann J.
Yastremska D.
6-37-65
Zheng Q.
Marino R.
6-36-3
Krejcikova B.
Ruse E.
6-16-4
Samsonova L.[8]
Liu C.
3-66-26-0
Haddad Maia B.[6]
Bouzkova M.
4-66-36-0
Pliskova K.
Bonaventure Y.
6-16-3
Ostapenko J.[5]
Collins D.
7-51-67-5
Mertens E.
Trevisan M.
6-06-2
Putintseva Y.
Andreescu B.
7-626-2