John Isner vs Emilio Gomez — Dallas Quarter-final

Dallas · ATP · Quarter-final
USA5
John Isner
41 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2023
hard
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Isner J.
7-6 7-5
Gomez E.
Isner J.
71072
Gomez E.
6850

John Isner defeated Emilio Gomez 7-6 7-5 in the Dallas quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — John Isner came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Isner J.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Isner J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Isner J.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
79%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
46%
Service points won·Clear edge
71%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
28%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
20.8
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 55). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Isner J.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
64
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
77
Break points won·Clear edge
0
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
98
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Isner J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gomez E.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
6.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.7
3-set count
0.0
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wu Y.
Isner J.[5]
6-747-637-612
Semi-finals
Wu Y.
Fritz T.[1]
6-737-56-4
Isner J.[5]
Wolf J.[6]
3-67-57-64
Quarter-finals
Wu Y.
Mannarino A.[8]
6-36-4
Fritz T.[1]
Giron M.[7]
7-673-66-3
Isner J.[5]
Gomez E.
7-687-5
Wolf J.[6]
Tiafoe F.[2]
4-66-36-4
R16
Wu Y.
Shapovalov D.[3]
7-616-4
Wolf J.[6]
Albot R.
6-37-65
Giron M.[7]
Otte O.
6-46-3
Mannarino A.[8]
Thompson J.
6-27-63
Fritz T.[1]
Sock J.
7-656-4
Isner J.[5]
Altmaier D.
6-37-61
Tiafoe F.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-16-3
Gomez E.
Kecmanovic M.[4]
2-67-646-4
R32
Sock J.
Ivashka I.
7-624-66-4
Altmaier D.
Svajda Z.
6-26-4
Giron M.[7]
Rybakov A.
6-46-716-1
Thompson J.
Kudla D.
6-17-5
Mannarino A.[8]
Johnson S.
7-666-2
Gomez E.
Diallo G.
6-46-757-65
Wu Y.
Mmoh M.
6-33-66-3
Isner J.[5]
Tseng C.
7-657-61
Wolf J.[6]
Holt B.
6-36-3
Otte O.
Eubanks C.
6-44-66-2
Albot R.
Krall L.
2-66-46-2
Mcdonald M.
Verdasco F.
6-36-0