Camila Giorgi vs Jaqueline Cristian — Linz Round of 32

Linz · WTA · Round of 32
ITA
Camila Giorgi
34 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2023
hard
Jaqueline Cristian
ROU
Jaqueline Cristian
#36WTA
1834ELO
1803Hard ELO
$742kYTD
$3.7MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
Giorgi C.
6-1 6-2
Cristian J.
Giorgi C.
662
Cristian J.
120

Camila Giorgi defeated Jaqueline Cristian 6-1 6-2 in the Linz round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Giorgi C.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Cristian J.

Cristian J.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Giorgi C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Giorgi C.Cristian J.
—
Serve
22
—
Return
25

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Giorgi C.Cristian J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
45%
Service points won·Even
57%
56%
Return points won·Even
43%
43%
Break points saved·Even
57%
55%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.7
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (48 vs 173). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Giorgi C.Cristian J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
77
Break points saved·Clear edge
71
84
Break points won·Slight edge
81
71
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
91
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
83
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Giorgi C.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cristian J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
2.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
-1°COvercast
Wind 3 km/hHumidity 63%

Draw

Final
Potapova A.[8]
Martic P.[6]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Potapova A.[8]
Vondrousova M.
6-16-746-3
Martic P.[6]
Sakkari M.[1]
3-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Vondrousova M.
Galfi D.
4-1
Martic P.[6]
Tauson C.
6-47-5
Potapova A.[8]
Friedsam A.
2-66-46-1
Sakkari M.[1]
Vekic D.[5]
6-37-68
R16
Tauson C.
Giorgi C.
1-66-36-4
Friedsam A.
Kalinina A.[4]
6-37-5
Vondrousova M.
Masarova R.
6-16-1
Potapova A.[8]
Niemeier J.
7-53-66-3
Vekic D.[5]
Brengle M.
6-36-1
Martic P.[6]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-46-757-63
Sakkari M.[1]
Gracheva V.
6-46-2
Galfi D.
Lys E.
6-43-66-3
R32
Potapova A.[8]
Bronzetti L.
2-66-36-4
Niemeier J.
Kenin S.
2-66-36-4
Kalinina A.[4]
Parks A.
6-27-5
Lys E.
Rakhimova K.
6-47-65
Vondrousova M.
Tomova V.
6-36-3
Masarova R.
Alexandrova E.[2]
4-66-17-66
Friedsam A.
Errani S.
6-26-4
Tauson C.
Begu I.[3]
6-16-2
Sakkari M.[1]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-17-66
Gracheva V.
Blinkova A.
7-57-5
Giorgi C.
Cristian J.
6-16-2
Van Uytvanck A.
Noskova L.
7-636-2
Vekic D.[5]
Korpatsch T.
7-646-1
Brengle M.
Grabher J.
7-626-2
Martic P.[6]
Bassols Ribera M.
6-17-5
Galfi D.
Pera B.[7]
6-27-65