Holger Rune vs Gregoire Barrere — Montpellier Quarter-final

Montpellier · ATP · Quarter-final
Holger Rune
DEN1
Holger Rune
#77ATP
1757ELO
1725Hard ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 February 2023
hard
FRA
Gregoire Barrere
#1288ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
Rune H.
7-6 7-6
Barrere G.
Rune H.
77772
Barrere G.
62650

Holger Rune defeated Gregoire Barrere 7-6 7-6 in the Montpellier quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Holger Rune came in ranked #77.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Barrere G.

Barrere G.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Rune H.Barrere G.
47
Serve
—
58
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Barrere G.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 154). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Barrere G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
92
Break points won·Dominant
84
18
Deciding sets·Clear edge
98
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Barrere G.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.2
Surface form
8.3
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.5
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Country comfort
6.2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
8°CMainly clear
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 66%
Final
Sinner J.[2]
Cressy M.
7-636-3
Semi-finals
Cressy M.
Rune H.[1]
7-56-737-64
Sinner J.[2]
Fils A.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.
Coric B.[3]
7-626-4
Fils A.
Halys Q.
7-636-3
Sinner J.[2]
Sonego L.
6-46-2
Rune H.[1]
Barrere G.
7-627-65
R16
Rune H.[1]
Huesler M.
7-656-2
Sinner J.[2]
Fucsovics M.
W/O
Cressy M.
Ruusuvuori E.[7]
6-46-4
Coric B.[3]
Rinderknech A.
6-37-5
Fils A.
Bautista Agut R.[4]
6-36-4
Sonego L.
Krajinovic F.
7-56-1
Halys Q.
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
6-36-3
Barrere G.
Basilashvili N.
6-36-4
R32
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Humbert U.
1-67-620-0
Huesler M.
Van Assche L.
6-33-66-3
Basilashvili N.
Lestienne C.
6-737-56-2
Barrere G.
Bublik A.[6]
6-46-7127-63
Rinderknech A.
Nardi L.
6-46-4
Cressy M.
Bellier A.
6-36-2
Ruusuvuori E.[7]
Ymer M.
6-46-0
Fils A.
Gasquet R.
7-57-5
Krajinovic F.
Karatsev A.
3-67-676-2
Fucsovics M.
Blancaneaux G.
7-55-76-0
Halys Q.
Chidekh C.
7-52-67-5
Sonego L.
Bonzi B.[8]
6-36-4