Vasek Pospisil vs Emilio Nava — Koblenz CH Round of 32

Koblenz CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CAN3
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 January 2023
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Pospisil V.
7-5 6-2
Nava E.
Pospisil V.
762
Nava E.
520

Vasek Pospisil defeated Emilio Nava 7-5 6-2 in the Koblenz CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Pospisil V.Nava E.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Nava E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
53%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.4
7.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (46 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Even
49
52
Break points saved·Even
96
94
Break points won·Slight edge
7
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pospisil V.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nava E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.8
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
6.0
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Pospisil V.Nava E.
Freshness·
—
100

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Safiullin R.[2]
Pospisil V.[3]
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Safiullin R.[2]
Collignon R.
5-76-36-0
Pospisil V.[3]
Kolar Z.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.
Marterer M.[4]
5-2
Safiullin R.[2]
Vatutin A.
6-31-66-2
Pospisil V.[3]
Wessels L.
6-46-2
Kolar Z.
Muller A.[7]
7-654-67-63
R16
Pospisil V.[3]
Rosenkranz M.
7-667-62
Vatutin A.
Broady L.[6]
6-26-3
Marterer M.[4]
Andreev A.
6-36-3
Collignon R.
Laaksonen H.
7-56-4
Wessels L.
Grenier H.[5]
6-46-3
Muller A.[7]
Choinski J.
6-36-747-5
Kolar Z.
Zhang Z.[1]
3-66-36-3
Safiullin R.[2]
Escoffier A.
6-34-67-62
R32
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-56-3
Marterer M.[4]
Sachko V.
7-56-2
Pospisil V.[3]
Nava E.
7-56-2
Escoffier A.
Topo M.
6-46-757-66
Broady L.[6]
Haase R.
7-626-1
Laaksonen H.
Nardi L.
7-696-3
Grenier H.[5]
Gerch L.
6-26-2
Wessels L.
Hoang A.
7-663-66-2
Rosenkranz M.
Lokoli L.
4-66-46-3
Muller A.[7]
Rehberg M.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Yevseyev D.
6-41-66-2
Kolar Z.
Bellier A.
6-26-4
Zhang Z.[1]
Squire H.
6-15-76-4
Vatutin A.
Haerteis J.
7-666-1
Safiullin R.[2]
Blancaneaux G.
5-76-36-1
Collignon R.
Brouwer G.[8]
5-77-626-3