Filip Misolic vs Cedrik Marcel Stebe — Tenerife 2 CH Round of 32

Tenerife 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Filip Misolic
AUT4
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1469Hard ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 January 2023
hard
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Misolic F.
6-1 6-1
Stebe C.
Misolic F.
662
Stebe C.
110

Filip Misolic defeated Cedrik Marcel Stebe 6-1 6-1 in the Tenerife 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Stebe C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Stebe C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Stebe C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
75
Break points won·Dominant
53
10
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Stebe C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3Hard Elo 1469
Surface ELO
5.7+54 Hard Elo edge
5.4Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1556
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
9.2
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Arnaldi M.[2]
Brancaccio R.[3]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Brancaccio R.[3]
Harris L.
W/O
Arnaldi M.[2]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Brancaccio R.[3]
Taberner C.[7]
6-36-766-0
Alvarez Varona N.
Moro Canas A.
1-66-26-3
Harris L.
Marcora R.
7-646-3
Arnaldi M.[2]
Krutykh O.
6-46-1
R16
Brancaccio R.[3]
Cox D.
6-36-3
Alvarez Varona N.
Peniston R.[5]
5-76-26-1
Arnaldi M.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-02-66-3
Moro Canas A.
Misolic F.[4]
7-57-5
Taberner C.[7]
Bonadio R.
6-46-0
Krutykh O.
Royer V.
6-46-756-3
Harris L.
Passaro F.[1]
3-66-47-5
Marcora R.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
1-67-56-3
R32
Peniston R.[5]
Clarke J.
3-67-57-65
Moro Canas A.
Maestrelli F.
7-56-1
Alvarez Varona N.
Caruso S.
6-37-5
Royer V.
Rosol L.
6-15-77-63
Mochizuki S.
Gigante M.
6-42-66-1
Krutykh O.
Giustino L.
6-26-0
Misolic F.[4]
Stebe C.
6-16-1
Taberner C.[7]
Moroni G.
7-56-3
Bonadio R.
Landaluce M.
7-56-4
Cox D.
Mager G.
7-633-66-2
Brancaccio R.[3]
Milojevic N.
0-67-56-2
Harris L.
Gakhov I.
6-06-4
Passaro F.[1]
Demin Y.
2-66-36-4
Arnaldi M.[2]
Giannessi A.
6-36-756-3
Marcora R.
Zekic M.
7-636-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Paire B.[8]
6-26-4