Tennys Sandgren vs Brandon Holt — Cleveland CH Round of 16

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 January 2023
hard
USA7
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Sandgren T.
6-3 4-6 6-2
Holt B.
Sandgren T.
6462
Holt B.
3621

Tennys Sandgren defeated Brandon Holt 6-3 4-6 6-2 in the Cleveland CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Tennys Sandgren closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.9
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
85
Break points won·Dominant
2
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Holt B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
6.1
Surface form
6.1
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
2.9
7.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kovacevic A.[5]
Wu Y.[2]
3-67-57-62
Semi-finals
Wu Y.[2]
Sandgren T.
6-36-2
Kovacevic A.[5]
Gomez E.[1]
6-756-46-3
Quarter-finals
Sandgren T.
Svajda Z.
6-02-67-61
Wu Y.[2]
Kozlov S.[6]
6-46-1
Gomez E.[1]
Diallo G.
7-654-67-5
Kovacevic A.[5]
Johnson S.[3]
6-757-56-4
R16
Wu Y.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
7-697-61
Kozlov S.[6]
Harrison R.
6-46-4
Kovacevic A.[5]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
Svajda Z.
Michelsen A.
7-56-3
Sandgren T.
Holt B.[7]
6-34-66-2
Johnson S.[3]
Seelig K.
7-696-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-766-16-1
Gomez E.[1]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-23-66-2
R32
Marchenko I.
Kodat T.
7-55-76-3
Pinnington Jones J.
Escobedo E.
6-23-1
Harrison R.
Angele J.
6-26-1
Kovacevic A.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-676-776-2
Johnson S.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-47-62
Krueger M.
Chappell N.
6-37-64
Gomez E.[1]
Clark E.
7-56-2
Michelsen A.
Sock J.[4]
7-636-4
Kozlov S.[6]
Kypson P.
6-47-68
Seelig K.
Smith K.
2-66-46-4
Wu Y.[2]
Mayo A.
6-10-66-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zhu E.
6-27-5
Svajda Z.
Pecotic M.
6-16-2
Sandgren T.
Ejupovic E.
6-26-747-64
Holt B.[7]
Perez A.
6-46-2
Diallo G.
Ayeni O.
6-16-1
Marchenko I.
Kodat T.
7-55-76-3