Emilio Gomez vs Jack Pinnington Jones — Cleveland CH Round of 16

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ECU1
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 January 2023
hard
GBR
Jack Pinnington Jones
#170ATP
1557ELO
1547Hard ELO
$211kYTD
$552kCAREER
23 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLLLL
Gomez E.
6-2 3-6 6-2
Pinnington Jones J.
Gomez E.
6362
Pinnington Jones J.
2621

Emilio Gomez defeated Jack Pinnington Jones 6-2 3-6 6-2 in the Cleveland CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Gomez came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Gomez closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Pinnington Jones J.

Pinnington Jones J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Serve advantage — Pinnington Jones J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Pinnington Jones J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Pinnington Jones J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
66
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
89
Break points won·Dominant
19
50
Deciding sets·Dominant
23
78
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pinnington Jones J.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 98 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gomez E.Pinnington Jones J.
Freshness·
—
98

Pinnington Jones J.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kovacevic A.[5]
Wu Y.[2]
3-67-57-62
Semi-finals
Wu Y.[2]
Sandgren T.
6-36-2
Kovacevic A.[5]
Gomez E.[1]
6-756-46-3
Quarter-finals
Sandgren T.
Svajda Z.
6-02-67-61
Wu Y.[2]
Kozlov S.[6]
6-46-1
Gomez E.[1]
Diallo G.
7-654-67-5
Kovacevic A.[5]
Johnson S.[3]
6-757-56-4
R16
Wu Y.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
7-697-61
Kozlov S.[6]
Harrison R.
6-46-4
Kovacevic A.[5]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
Svajda Z.
Michelsen A.
7-56-3
Sandgren T.
Holt B.[7]
6-34-66-2
Johnson S.[3]
Seelig K.
7-696-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-766-16-1
Gomez E.[1]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-23-66-2
R32
Marchenko I.
Kodat T.
7-55-76-3
Pinnington Jones J.
Escobedo E.
6-23-1
Harrison R.
Angele J.
6-26-1
Kovacevic A.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-676-776-2
Johnson S.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-47-62
Krueger M.
Chappell N.
6-37-64
Gomez E.[1]
Clark E.
7-56-2
Michelsen A.
Sock J.[4]
7-636-4
Kozlov S.[6]
Kypson P.
6-47-68
Seelig K.
Smith K.
2-66-46-4
Wu Y.[2]
Mayo A.
6-10-66-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zhu E.
6-27-5
Svajda Z.
Pecotic M.
6-16-2
Sandgren T.
Ejupovic E.
6-26-747-64
Holt B.[7]
Perez A.
6-46-2
Diallo G.
Ayeni O.
6-16-1
Marchenko I.
Kodat T.
7-55-76-3