Tennys Sandgren vs Elmar Ejupovic — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 January 2023
hard
GER
Elmar Ejupovic
#752ATP
33 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Sandgren T.
6-2 6-7 7-6
Ejupovic E.
Sandgren T.
664772
Ejupovic E.
277641

Tennys Sandgren defeated Elmar Ejupovic 6-2 6-7 7-6 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Tennys Sandgren closed it out in three sets, 6–2 6–7 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Ejupovic E.

Ejupovic E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Ejupovic E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
34%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.7
7.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Ejupovic E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
7
Break points saved·Even
92
88
Break points won·Even
2
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
0
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ejupovic E.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
6.6
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kovacevic A.[5]
Wu Y.[2]
3-67-57-62
Semi-finals
Wu Y.[2]
Sandgren T.
6-36-2
Kovacevic A.[5]
Gomez E.[1]
6-756-46-3
Quarter-finals
Sandgren T.
Svajda Z.
6-02-67-61
Wu Y.[2]
Kozlov S.[6]
6-46-1
Gomez E.[1]
Diallo G.
7-654-67-5
Kovacevic A.[5]
Johnson S.[3]
6-757-56-4
R16
Wu Y.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
7-697-61
Kozlov S.[6]
Harrison R.
6-46-4
Kovacevic A.[5]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
Svajda Z.
Michelsen A.
7-56-3
Sandgren T.
Holt B.[7]
6-34-66-2
Johnson S.[3]
Seelig K.
7-696-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-766-16-1
Gomez E.[1]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-23-66-2
R32
Marchenko I.
Kodat T.
7-55-76-3
Pinnington Jones J.
Escobedo E.
6-23-1
Harrison R.
Angele J.
6-26-1
Kovacevic A.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-676-776-2
Johnson S.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-47-62
Krueger M.
Chappell N.
6-37-64
Gomez E.[1]
Clark E.
7-56-2
Michelsen A.
Sock J.[4]
7-636-4
Kozlov S.[6]
Kypson P.
6-47-68
Seelig K.
Smith K.
2-66-46-4
Wu Y.[2]
Mayo A.
6-10-66-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zhu E.
6-27-5
Svajda Z.
Pecotic M.
6-16-2
Sandgren T.
Ejupovic E.
6-26-747-64
Holt B.[7]
Perez A.
6-46-2
Diallo G.
Ayeni O.
6-16-1
Marchenko I.
Kodat T.
7-55-76-3