Jule Niemeier vs Olga Danilovic — Lyon Round of 32

Lyon · WTA · Round of 32
Jule Niemeier
GER
Jule Niemeier
#510WTA
1418ELO
1423Hard ELO
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 January 2023
hard
Olga Danilovic
SRB
Olga Danilovic
#216WTA
1819ELO
1740Hard ELO
25 yrs · 182 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Niemeier J.
7-5 2-6 6-3
Danilovic O.
Niemeier J.
7262
Danilovic O.
5631

Jule Niemeier defeated Olga Danilovic 7-5 2-6 6-3 in the Lyon round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jule Niemeier closed it out in three sets, 7–5 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Niemeier J.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Danilovic O.

Danilovic O.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Niemeier J.

Serve advantage — Danilovic O.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Niemeier J.Danilovic O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
42%
48%
Service points won·Even
54%
58%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
50%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.8
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
7.1
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (132 vs 119). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Niemeier J.Danilovic O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
12
77
Break points saved·Dominant
33
82
Break points won·Slight edge
82
88
Deciding sets·Dominant
9
90
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
42
65

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Niemeier J.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Danilovic O.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 79 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
1.2Hard Elo 1423
Surface ELO
8.8+317 Hard Elo edge
0.2Overall Elo 1418
ELO gap
9.8Overall Elo 1819
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
1.9
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
2°CClear
Wind 12 km/hHumidity 71%

Draw

Final
Parks A.
Garcia C.[1]
7-677-5
Semi-finals
Parks A.
Zanevska M.
6-37-64
Garcia C.[1]
Osorio C.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Zanevska M.
Potapova A.[5]
3-66-16-2
Osorio C.
Noskova L.
6-47-63
Garcia C.[1]
Paolini J.
7-57-5
Parks A.
Kovinic D.[7]
7-56-2
R16
Paolini J.
Andreeva E.
6-26-3
Noskova L.
Sherif M.[6]
6-36-2
Kovinic D.[7]
Bondar A.
4-66-26-3
Zanevska M.
Zhang S.[2]
6-26-0
Osorio C.
Niemeier J.
7-657-5
Parks A.
Martic P.[4]
2-67-636-2
Potapova A.[5]
Burel C.
6-44-66-3
Garcia C.[1]
Van Uytvanck A.
2-66-06-1
R32
Andreeva E.
Blinkova A.[8]
6-736-44-0
Bondar A.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-46-4
Sherif M.[6]
Konjuh A.
6-23-2
Garcia C.[1]
Martincova T.
6-47-64
Zanevska M.
Galfi D.
6-17-63
Paolini J.
Masarova R.
6-36-2
Noskova L.
Muguruza G.
6-16-4
Kovinic D.[7]
Golubic V.
6-16-4
Van Uytvanck A.
Korpatsch T.
6-26-4
Zhang S.[2]
Brengle M.
6-36-2
Potapova A.[5]
Bassols Ribera M.
4-66-16-2
Niemeier J.
Danilovic O.
7-52-66-3
Osorio C.
Cornet A.[3]
6-44-66-1
Parks A.
Grabher J.
6-35-76-4
Martic P.[4]
Mladenovic K.
3-66-37-5
Burel C.
Bogdan A.
7-56-4