Emilio Gomez vs Ezekiel Clark — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ECU1
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 January 2023
hard
USA
Ezekiel Clark
#1280ATP
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWLLW
Gomez E.
7-5 6-2
Clark E.
Gomez E.
762
Clark E.
520

Emilio Gomez defeated Ezekiel Clark 7-5 6-2 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Gomez came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Gomez closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving73% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Clark E.

Clark E.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Clark E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
1.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Clark E.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
1.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kovacevic A.[5]
Wu Y.[2]
3-67-57-62
Semi-finals
Wu Y.[2]
Sandgren T.
6-36-2
Kovacevic A.[5]
Gomez E.[1]
6-756-46-3
Quarter-finals
Sandgren T.
Svajda Z.
6-02-67-61
Wu Y.[2]
Kozlov S.[6]
6-46-1
Gomez E.[1]
Diallo G.
7-654-67-5
Kovacevic A.[5]
Johnson S.[3]
6-757-56-4
R16
Wu Y.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
7-697-61
Kozlov S.[6]
Harrison R.
6-46-4
Kovacevic A.[5]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
Svajda Z.
Michelsen A.
7-56-3
Sandgren T.
Holt B.[7]
6-34-66-2
Johnson S.[3]
Seelig K.
7-696-2
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-766-16-1
Gomez E.[1]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-23-66-2
R32
Marchenko I.
Kodat T.
7-55-76-3
Pinnington Jones J.
Escobedo E.
6-23-1
Harrison R.
Angele J.
6-26-1
Kovacevic A.[5]
Rybakov A.
7-676-776-2
Johnson S.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-47-62
Krueger M.
Chappell N.
6-37-64
Gomez E.[1]
Clark E.
7-56-2
Michelsen A.
Sock J.[4]
7-636-4
Kozlov S.[6]
Kypson P.
6-47-68
Seelig K.
Smith K.
2-66-46-4
Wu Y.[2]
Mayo A.
6-10-66-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zhu E.
6-27-5
Svajda Z.
Pecotic M.
6-16-2
Sandgren T.
Ejupovic E.
6-26-747-64
Holt B.[7]
Perez A.
6-46-2
Diallo G.
Ayeni O.
6-16-1
Marchenko I.
Kodat T.
7-55-76-3