Fabian Marozsan vs Cem Ilkel — Ottignies Louvain CH Round of 16

Ottignies Louvain CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Fabian Marozsan
HUN
Fabian Marozsan
#54ATP
1784ELO
1747Hard ELO
$728kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
26 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 January 2023
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Marozsan F.
6-2 6-4
Ilkel C.
Marozsan F.
662
Ilkel C.
240

Fabian Marozsan defeated Cem Ilkel 6-2 6-4 in the Ottignies Louvain CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Fabian Marozsan came in ranked #54.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marozsan F.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Marozsan F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Marozsan F.Ilkel C.
31
Serve
—
45
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Marozsan F.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Even
4.3
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marozsan F.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
32
Break points saved·Dominant
97
49
Break points won·Dominant
36
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marozsan F.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ilkel C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.4No prior meetings
H2H
4.6
5.4
Surface form
8.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
6.6
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Marozsan F.Ilkel C.
Freshness·
98
—

Marozsan F.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Goffin D.[1]
Ymer M.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Ymer M.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-4
Goffin D.[1]
Onclin G.
7-636-2
Quarter-finals
Celikbilek A.
Misolic F.
6-45-76-4
Onclin G.
Uchida K.
6-36-3
Goffin D.[1]
Hanfmann Y.[8]
4-66-26-1
Ymer M.
Marozsan F.
6-26-1
R16
Celikbilek A.
Ymer E.[6]
6-36-3
Uchida K.
Kovalik J.
7-676-1
Marozsan F.
Ilkel C.
6-26-4
Goffin D.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-4
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Berankis R.
6-13-66-1
Misolic F.
De Loore J.
7-653-67-5
Ymer M.
Gojo B.[7]
6-47-5
Onclin G.
Gulbis E.
6-766-26-3
R32
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Serdarusic N.
6-47-5
Misolic F.
Machac T.[4]
6-23-66-2
Goffin D.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-26-4
Gojo B.[7]
Bergs Z.
6-17-66
De Loore J.
Colson T.
6-43-66-2
Kovalik J.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-747-56-4
Berankis R.
Laaksonen H.
7-56-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Brancaccio R.
6-07-64
Ilkel C.
Shevchenko A.
6-16-766-3
Ymer E.[6]
De Schepper K.
6-47-61
Onclin G.
Humbert U.[3]
7-56-1
Celikbilek A.
Vacherot V.
6-46-2
Marozsan F.
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-1
Gulbis E.
Klein L.
6-46-2
Uchida K.
Kachmazov A.
6-46-4
Ymer M.
Collignon R.
6-756-26-2