Altug Celikbilek vs Valentin Vacherot — Ottignies Louvain CH Round of 32

Ottignies Louvain CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 January 2023
hard
Valentin Vacherot
MON
Valentin Vacherot
#21ATP
1903ELO
1852Hard ELO
$1.0MYTD
$3.5MCAREER
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWWLWW
Celikbilek A.
6-4 6-2
Vacherot V.
Celikbilek A.
662
Vacherot V.
420

Altug Celikbilek defeated Valentin Vacherot 6-4 6-2 in the Ottignies Louvain CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Celikbilek A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Vacherot V.

Vacherot V.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Serve advantage — Vacherot V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Celikbilek A.Vacherot V.
—
Serve
68
—
Return
23

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Celikbilek A.Vacherot V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Even
6.4
6.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 173). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Celikbilek A.Vacherot V.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
69
Break points saved·Clear edge
73
96
Break points won·Slight edge
38
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
26
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Celikbilek A.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Vacherot V.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
2.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.9
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Goffin D.[1]
Ymer M.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Ymer M.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-4
Goffin D.[1]
Onclin G.
7-636-2
Quarter-finals
Celikbilek A.
Misolic F.
6-45-76-4
Onclin G.
Uchida K.
6-36-3
Goffin D.[1]
Hanfmann Y.[8]
4-66-26-1
Ymer M.
Marozsan F.
6-26-1
R16
Celikbilek A.
Ymer E.[6]
6-36-3
Uchida K.
Kovalik J.
7-676-1
Marozsan F.
Ilkel C.
6-26-4
Goffin D.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-4
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Berankis R.
6-13-66-1
Misolic F.
De Loore J.
7-653-67-5
Ymer M.
Gojo B.[7]
6-47-5
Onclin G.
Gulbis E.
6-766-26-3
R32
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Serdarusic N.
6-47-5
Misolic F.
Machac T.[4]
6-23-66-2
Goffin D.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-26-4
Gojo B.[7]
Bergs Z.
6-17-66
De Loore J.
Colson T.
6-43-66-2
Kovalik J.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-747-56-4
Berankis R.
Laaksonen H.
7-56-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Brancaccio R.
6-07-64
Ilkel C.
Shevchenko A.
6-16-766-3
Ymer E.[6]
De Schepper K.
6-47-61
Onclin G.
Humbert U.[3]
7-56-1
Celikbilek A.
Vacherot V.
6-46-2
Marozsan F.
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-1
Gulbis E.
Klein L.
6-46-2
Uchida K.
Kachmazov A.
6-46-4
Ymer M.
Collignon R.
6-756-26-2