Borna Gojo vs Zizou Bergs — Ottignies Louvain CH Round of 32

Ottignies Louvain CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO7
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 January 2023
hard
Zizou Bergs
BEL
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1757Hard ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
Gojo B.
6-1 7-6
Bergs Z.
Gojo B.
6782
Bergs Z.
1660

Borna Gojo defeated Zizou Bergs 6-1 7-6 in the Ottignies Louvain CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35.

Key context

  • Match story: Borna Gojo came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Bergs Z.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gojo B.Bergs Z.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
40

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Bergs Z.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.7
6.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Bergs Z.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
69
Break points saved·Even
95
95
Break points won·Slight edge
10
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
92
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
73
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Bergs Z.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.8Hard Elo 1662
Surface ELO
6.2+95 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1808
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
5.3
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Bergs Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
82

Gojo B.: 20 days rest · Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Goffin D.[1]
Ymer M.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Ymer M.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-4
Goffin D.[1]
Onclin G.
7-636-2
Quarter-finals
Celikbilek A.
Misolic F.
6-45-76-4
Onclin G.
Uchida K.
6-36-3
Goffin D.[1]
Hanfmann Y.[8]
4-66-26-1
Ymer M.
Marozsan F.
6-26-1
R16
Celikbilek A.
Ymer E.[6]
6-36-3
Uchida K.
Kovalik J.
7-676-1
Marozsan F.
Ilkel C.
6-26-4
Goffin D.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-4
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Berankis R.
6-13-66-1
Misolic F.
De Loore J.
7-653-67-5
Ymer M.
Gojo B.[7]
6-47-5
Onclin G.
Gulbis E.
6-766-26-3
R32
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Serdarusic N.
6-47-5
Misolic F.
Machac T.[4]
6-23-66-2
Goffin D.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-26-4
Gojo B.[7]
Bergs Z.
6-17-66
De Loore J.
Colson T.
6-43-66-2
Kovalik J.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-747-56-4
Berankis R.
Laaksonen H.
7-56-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Brancaccio R.
6-07-64
Ilkel C.
Shevchenko A.
6-16-766-3
Ymer E.[6]
De Schepper K.
6-47-61
Onclin G.
Humbert U.[3]
7-56-1
Celikbilek A.
Vacherot V.
6-46-2
Marozsan F.
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-1
Gulbis E.
Klein L.
6-46-2
Uchida K.
Kachmazov A.
6-46-4
Ymer M.
Collignon R.
6-756-26-2