Shintaro Mochizuki vs Paul Jubb — Nonthaburi 3 CH Round of 32

Nonthaburi 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Shintaro Mochizuki
JPN
Shintaro Mochizuki
#115ATP
1475ELO
1425Hard ELO
$243kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 January 2023
hard
GBR5
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
Mochizuki S.
2-6 6-4 7-5
Jubb P.
Mochizuki S.
2672
Jubb P.
6451

Shintaro Mochizuki defeated Paul Jubb 2-6 6-4 7-5 in the Nonthaburi 3 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Shintaro Mochizuki came in ranked #115.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mochizuki S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mochizuki S.

Serve advantage — Jubb P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mochizuki S.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 105). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mochizuki S.Jubb P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
52
38
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
84
Break points won·Dominant
55
6
Deciding sets·Even
47
44
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
80
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mochizuki S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Jubb P.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+22 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1403
6.0Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1426
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
3.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
9.0
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mochizuki S.Jubb P.
Freshness·Clear edge
86
100

Mochizuki S.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Jubb P.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shimabukuro S.
Cazaux A.
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Shimabukuro S.
Hong S.
6-27-5
Cazaux A.
Fonio G.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Fonio G.
Escoffier A.[3]
7-56-752-1
Hong S.
Geerts M.
6-17-5
Shimabukuro S.
Kolar Z.[8]
6-06-776-2
Cazaux A.
Sandgren T.
7-646-4
R16
Shimabukuro S.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-644-66-1
Escoffier A.[3]
Michalski D.
6-34-66-1
Hong S.
Ly N.
6-27-63
Cazaux A.
Mensik J.
6-36-0
Fonio G.
Hassan B.
6-746-46-2
Geerts M.
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.[8]
Choinski J.
6-43-66-0
Sandgren T.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-1
Cazaux A.
Mensik J.
6-36-0
R32
Sandgren T.
Added D.
1-66-46-1
Geerts M.
Charoenphon Y.
6-36-1
Zuk K.
Furness E.[4]
6-16-1
Choinski J.
Navasirisomboon J.
6-16-3
Hassan B.
Moriya H.
6-06-4
Michalski D.
Palan D.
6-46-2
Shimabukuro S.
Moraing M.
6-36-2
Mensik J.
Ritschard A.[2]
7-657-5
Cazaux A.
Parker S.
7-616-4
Escoffier A.[3]
Travaglia S.
6-17-64
Ly N.
Ionel N.[6]
6-17-65
Hong S.
Samrej K.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-4
Mochizuki S.
Jubb P.[5]
2-66-47-5
Kolar Z.[8]
Donskoy E.
3-67-676-2
Fonio G.
Yevseyev D.
6-27-5
Mensik J.
Ritschard A.
7-657-5