Nam Hoang Ly vs Nicholas David Ionel — Nonthaburi 3 CH Round of 32

Nonthaburi 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
VIE
Nam Hoang Ly
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 January 2023
hard
Nicholas David Ionel
ROU6
Nicholas David Ionel
#807ATP
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLWLL
Ly N.
6-1 7-6
Ionel N.
Ly N.
6772
Ionel N.
1650

Nam Hoang Ly defeated Nicholas David Ionel 6-1 7-6 in the Nonthaburi 3 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Nam Hoang Ly came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Nam Hoang Ly came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ly N.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ionel N.

Ionel N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ly N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ly N.Ionel N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
71%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
54%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.6
1.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ly N.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Ionel N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shimabukuro S.
Cazaux A.
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Shimabukuro S.
Hong S.
6-27-5
Cazaux A.
Fonio G.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Fonio G.
Escoffier A.[3]
7-56-752-1
Hong S.
Geerts M.
6-17-5
Shimabukuro S.
Kolar Z.[8]
6-06-776-2
Cazaux A.
Sandgren T.
7-646-4
R16
Shimabukuro S.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-644-66-1
Escoffier A.[3]
Michalski D.
6-34-66-1
Hong S.
Ly N.
6-27-63
Cazaux A.
Mensik J.
6-36-0
Fonio G.
Hassan B.
6-746-46-2
Geerts M.
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.[8]
Choinski J.
6-43-66-0
Sandgren T.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-1
Cazaux A.
Mensik J.
6-36-0
R32
Sandgren T.
Added D.
1-66-46-1
Geerts M.
Charoenphon Y.
6-36-1
Zuk K.
Furness E.[4]
6-16-1
Choinski J.
Navasirisomboon J.
6-16-3
Hassan B.
Moriya H.
6-06-4
Michalski D.
Palan D.
6-46-2
Shimabukuro S.
Moraing M.
6-36-2
Mensik J.
Ritschard A.[2]
7-657-5
Cazaux A.
Parker S.
7-616-4
Escoffier A.[3]
Travaglia S.
6-17-64
Ly N.
Ionel N.[6]
6-17-65
Hong S.
Samrej K.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-4
Mochizuki S.
Jubb P.[5]
2-66-47-5
Kolar Z.[8]
Donskoy E.
3-67-676-2
Fonio G.
Yevseyev D.
6-27-5
Mensik J.
Ritschard A.
7-657-5