Seong Chan Hong vs Michael Geerts — Nonthaburi 3 CH Quarter-final

Nonthaburi 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
KOR
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 January 2023
hard
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Hong S.
6-1 7-5
Geerts M.
Hong S.
672
Geerts M.
150

Seong Chan Hong defeated Michael Geerts 6-1 7-5 in the Nonthaburi 3 CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Seong Chan Hong came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hong S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hong S.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hong S.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
9
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
82
Break points won·Dominant
30
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
65
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hong S.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Geerts M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shimabukuro S.
Cazaux A.
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Shimabukuro S.
Hong S.
6-27-5
Cazaux A.
Fonio G.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Fonio G.
Escoffier A.[3]
7-56-752-1
Hong S.
Geerts M.
6-17-5
Shimabukuro S.
Kolar Z.[8]
6-06-776-2
Cazaux A.
Sandgren T.
7-646-4
R16
Shimabukuro S.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-644-66-1
Escoffier A.[3]
Michalski D.
6-34-66-1
Hong S.
Ly N.
6-27-63
Cazaux A.
Mensik J.
6-36-0
Fonio G.
Hassan B.
6-746-46-2
Geerts M.
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.[8]
Choinski J.
6-43-66-0
Sandgren T.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-1
Cazaux A.
Mensik J.
6-36-0
R32
Sandgren T.
Added D.
1-66-46-1
Geerts M.
Charoenphon Y.
6-36-1
Zuk K.
Furness E.[4]
6-16-1
Choinski J.
Navasirisomboon J.
6-16-3
Hassan B.
Moriya H.
6-06-4
Michalski D.
Palan D.
6-46-2
Shimabukuro S.
Moraing M.
6-36-2
Mensik J.
Ritschard A.[2]
7-657-5
Cazaux A.
Parker S.
7-616-4
Escoffier A.[3]
Travaglia S.
6-17-64
Ly N.
Ionel N.[6]
6-17-65
Hong S.
Samrej K.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-4
Mochizuki S.
Jubb P.[5]
2-66-47-5
Kolar Z.[8]
Donskoy E.
3-67-676-2
Fonio G.
Yevseyev D.
6-27-5
Mensik J.
Ritschard A.
7-657-5