Antoine Escoffier vs Daniel Michalski — Nonthaburi 3 CH Round of 16

Nonthaburi 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA3
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 January 2023
hard
Daniel Michalski
POL
Daniel Michalski
#299ATP
1435ELO
1426Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
Escoffier A.
6-3 4-6 6-1
Michalski D.
Escoffier A.
6462
Michalski D.
3611

Antoine Escoffier defeated Daniel Michalski 6-3 4-6 6-1 in the Nonthaburi 3 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Antoine Escoffier came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–3 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escoffier A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Michalski D.

Michalski D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Serve advantage — Escoffier A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escoffier A.Michalski D.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.1
1.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escoffier A.Michalski D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
26
Break points saved·Dominant
68
24
Break points won·Slight edge
18
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
11
64
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escoffier A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Michalski D.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.1Hard Elo 1413
Surface ELO
4.9+13 Hard Elo edge
5.5Overall Elo 1436
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1435
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
3.5
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
3.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Escoffier A.Michalski D.
Freshness·
—
73

Michalski D.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 67 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shimabukuro S.
Cazaux A.
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Shimabukuro S.
Hong S.
6-27-5
Cazaux A.
Fonio G.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Fonio G.
Escoffier A.[3]
7-56-752-1
Hong S.
Geerts M.
6-17-5
Shimabukuro S.
Kolar Z.[8]
6-06-776-2
Cazaux A.
Sandgren T.
7-646-4
R16
Shimabukuro S.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-644-66-1
Escoffier A.[3]
Michalski D.
6-34-66-1
Hong S.
Ly N.
6-27-63
Cazaux A.
Mensik J.
6-36-0
Fonio G.
Hassan B.
6-746-46-2
Geerts M.
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.[8]
Choinski J.
6-43-66-0
Sandgren T.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-1
Cazaux A.
Mensik J.
6-36-0
R32
Sandgren T.
Added D.
1-66-46-1
Geerts M.
Charoenphon Y.
6-36-1
Zuk K.
Furness E.[4]
6-16-1
Choinski J.
Navasirisomboon J.
6-16-3
Hassan B.
Moriya H.
6-06-4
Michalski D.
Palan D.
6-46-2
Shimabukuro S.
Moraing M.
6-36-2
Mensik J.
Ritschard A.[2]
7-657-5
Cazaux A.
Parker S.
7-616-4
Escoffier A.[3]
Travaglia S.
6-17-64
Ly N.
Ionel N.[6]
6-17-65
Hong S.
Samrej K.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-4
Mochizuki S.
Jubb P.[5]
2-66-47-5
Kolar Z.[8]
Donskoy E.
3-67-676-2
Fonio G.
Yevseyev D.
6-27-5
Mensik J.
Ritschard A.
7-657-5