Arthur Cazaux vs Giovanni Fonio — Nonthaburi 3 CH Semi-final

Nonthaburi 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 January 2023
hard
ITA
Giovanni Fonio
#910ATP
1349ELO
1350Hard ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
Cazaux A.
7-5 6-3
Fonio G.
Cazaux A.
762
Fonio G.
530

Arthur Cazaux defeated Giovanni Fonio 7-5 6-3 in the Nonthaburi 3 CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98, defending last year's final.

Key context

  • Match story: Arthur Cazaux closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Fonio G.

Fonio G.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Fonio G.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Fonio G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Fonio G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
6
Break points saved·Dominant
97
63
Break points won·Clear edge
27
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
9.0
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Fonio G.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.9+388 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.1Hard Elo 1350
10.0Overall Elo 1793
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1349
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.7
Surface form
6.1
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.1
Minutes 14d
2.4
0.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shimabukuro S.
Cazaux A.
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Shimabukuro S.
Hong S.
6-27-5
Cazaux A.
Fonio G.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Fonio G.
Escoffier A.[3]
7-56-752-1
Hong S.
Geerts M.
6-17-5
Shimabukuro S.
Kolar Z.[8]
6-06-776-2
Cazaux A.
Sandgren T.
7-646-4
R16
Shimabukuro S.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-644-66-1
Escoffier A.[3]
Michalski D.
6-34-66-1
Hong S.
Ly N.
6-27-63
Cazaux A.
Mensik J.
6-36-0
Fonio G.
Hassan B.
6-746-46-2
Geerts M.
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.[8]
Choinski J.
6-43-66-0
Sandgren T.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-1
Cazaux A.
Mensik J.
6-36-0
R32
Sandgren T.
Added D.
1-66-46-1
Geerts M.
Charoenphon Y.
6-36-1
Zuk K.
Furness E.[4]
6-16-1
Choinski J.
Navasirisomboon J.
6-16-3
Hassan B.
Moriya H.
6-06-4
Michalski D.
Palan D.
6-46-2
Shimabukuro S.
Moraing M.
6-36-2
Mensik J.
Ritschard A.[2]
7-657-5
Cazaux A.
Parker S.
7-616-4
Escoffier A.[3]
Travaglia S.
6-17-64
Ly N.
Ionel N.[6]
6-17-65
Hong S.
Samrej K.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-4
Mochizuki S.
Jubb P.[5]
2-66-47-5
Kolar Z.[8]
Donskoy E.
3-67-676-2
Fonio G.
Yevseyev D.
6-27-5
Mensik J.
Ritschard A.
7-657-5