Mikael Ymer vs Emil Ruusuvuori — Adelaide 2 Round of 32

Adelaide 2 · ATP · Round of 32
SWE
Mikael Ymer
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
FIN
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1577Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Ymer M.
6-4 4-6 6-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Ymer M.
6462
Ruusuvuori E.
4631

Mikael Ymer defeated Emil Ruusuvuori 6-4 4-6 6-3 in the Adelaide 2 round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Emil Ruusuvuori came in leading the head-to-head 3–1. Mikael Ymer narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Mikael Ymer closed it out in three sets, 6–4 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-06MontpellierR32hardEmil Ruusuvuori6-4 6-0
2022-08-01WashingtonR16hardMikael Ymer6-3 6-7(3) 6-4
2021-07-12BastadR32clayEmil Ruusuvuori1-6 6-4 6-3
2021-03-22Miami MastersR32hardEmil Ruusuvuori4-6 6-1 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Ruusuvuori E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ymer M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer M.Ruusuvuori E.
1st serve in·Even
67%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.6
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer M.Ruusuvuori E.
Clutch Rating·Even
71
72
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
97
Break points won·Clear edge
71
48
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ymer M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ruusuvuori E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.4
H2H
4.6
5.9
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
9.2
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.
Bautista Agut R.[4]
6-43-67-64
Semi-finals
Kwon S.
Draper J.
7-666-726-3
Bautista Agut R.[4]
Kokkinakis T.
7-643-66-3
Quarter-finals
Kwon S.
Ymer M.
6-16-2
Bautista Agut R.[4]
Davidovich Fokina A.[7]
6-36-2
Draper J.
Khachanov K.[3]
6-47-63
Kokkinakis T.
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-36-746-1
R16
Davidovich Fokina A.[7]
Millman J.
6-36-3
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Kubler J.
5-77-616-4
Ymer M.
Mcdonald M.
3-67-626-3
Draper J.
Paul T.[8]
6-46-4
Kokkinakis T.
Rublev A.[1]
6-43-66-3
Khachanov K.[3]
Huesler M.
6-46-4
Bautista Agut R.[4]
Haase R.
6-33-66-3
Kwon S.
Carreno Busta P.[2]
3-66-46-4
R32
Mcdonald M.
Evans D.[5]
7-57-5
Kubler J.
Etcheverry T.
7-627-5
Haase R.
Bonzi B.
3-67-687-63
Kokkinakis T.
Popyrin A.
6-06-757-5
Millman J.
Ramos A.
4-66-37-66
Davidovich Fokina A.[7]
Nakashima B.
6-27-63
Paul T.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-47-5
Draper J.
Sonego L.
6-46-2
Huesler M.
Rinderknech A.
4-67-656-4
Kwon S.
Machac T.
6-46-4
Ymer M.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-44-66-3
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Edmund K.
6-47-5