Dino Prizmic vs Clement Tabur — Oeiras 2 CH Qualifying Round 1

Oeiras 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Dino Prizmic
CRO
Dino Prizmic
#84ATP
1841ELO
1733Hard ELO
$530kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
Clement Tabur
FRA1
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1573Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
Prizmic D.
7-5 6-4
Tabur C.
Prizmic D.
762
Tabur C.
540

Dino Prizmic defeated Clement Tabur 7-5 6-4 in the Oeiras 2 CH qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Dino Prizmic came in ranked #84, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Dino Prizmic extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-01WimbledonQ1grassDino Prizmic6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Prizmic D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Prizmic D.

Serve advantage — Prizmic D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Prizmic D.Tabur C.
34
Serve
—
20
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Prizmic D.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (172 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Prizmic D.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
74
Break points won·Dominant
64
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
40
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
37
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Prizmic D.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Tabur C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+160 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1573
7.7Overall Elo 1841
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1607
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.2
Surface form
3.8
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
9.3
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Prizmic D.Tabur C.
Freshness·Dominant
87
55

Prizmic D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q2
Fanselow S.
Sachko V.[8]
2-66-37-5
Prizmic D.
Friberg K.
6-36-0
Ilkel C.[12]
Molleker R.[6]
7-617-61
Decamps G.[2]
De Schepper K.[10]
3-66-37-5
Ejupovic E.[4]
Barroso Campos A.
6-47-5
Lajal M.
Marchenko I.
6-27-5
Q1
Ejupovic E.[4]
Araujo P.
6-36-3
Sachko V.[8]
Kirkin E.
7-56-3
Ilkel C.[12]
Coelho F.
6-36-4
Friberg K.
Janvier M.[9]
6-36-4
De Schepper K.[10]
Pereira T.
6-06-1
Molleker R.[6]
Leshem E.
6-46-747-67
Fanselow S.
Houkes M.[5]
6-26-2
Barroso Campos A.
Cukierman D.[11]
6-17-63
Lajal M.
Kachmazov A.[7]
6-26-4
Marchenko I.
Vatutin A.[3]
6-47-62
Decamps G.[2]
Rocha H.
7-56-3
Prizmic D.
Tabur C.[1]
7-56-4