John Millman vs Albert Ramos — Adelaide 2 Round of 32

Adelaide 2 · ATP · Round of 32
AUS
John Millman
37 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
ESP
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1520Hard ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Millman J.
4-6 6-3 7-6
Ramos A.
Millman J.
46782
Ramos A.
63661

John Millman defeated Albert Ramos 4-6 6-3 7-6 in the Adelaide 2 round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — John Millman came in defending last year's round of 32. John Millman extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-22Winston-SalemR32hardAlbert Ramos6-4 6-4
2016-08-22Winston-SalemR32hardJohn Millman4-6 7-5 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Millman J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Ramos A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Millman J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Millman J.Ramos A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
56%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.4
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (11 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Millman J.Ramos A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
70
59
Break points saved·Even
95
95
Break points won·Clear edge
64
49
Deciding sets·Slight edge
70
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Millman J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ramos A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.6
Surface form
1.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
7.3
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.
Bautista Agut R.[4]
6-43-67-64
Semi-finals
Kwon S.
Draper J.
7-666-726-3
Bautista Agut R.[4]
Kokkinakis T.
7-643-66-3
Quarter-finals
Kwon S.
Ymer M.
6-16-2
Bautista Agut R.[4]
Davidovich Fokina A.[7]
6-36-2
Draper J.
Khachanov K.[3]
6-47-63
Kokkinakis T.
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-36-746-1
R16
Davidovich Fokina A.[7]
Millman J.
6-36-3
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Kubler J.
5-77-616-4
Ymer M.
Mcdonald M.
3-67-626-3
Draper J.
Paul T.[8]
6-46-4
Kokkinakis T.
Rublev A.[1]
6-43-66-3
Khachanov K.[3]
Huesler M.
6-46-4
Bautista Agut R.[4]
Haase R.
6-33-66-3
Kwon S.
Carreno Busta P.[2]
3-66-46-4
R32
Mcdonald M.
Evans D.[5]
7-57-5
Kubler J.
Etcheverry T.
7-627-5
Haase R.
Bonzi B.
3-67-687-63
Kokkinakis T.
Popyrin A.
6-06-757-5
Millman J.
Ramos A.
4-66-37-66
Davidovich Fokina A.[7]
Nakashima B.
6-27-63
Paul T.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-47-5
Draper J.
Sonego L.
6-46-2
Huesler M.
Rinderknech A.
4-67-656-4
Kwon S.
Machac T.
6-46-4
Ymer M.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-44-66-3
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Edmund K.
6-47-5