Dino Prizmic vs Sebastian Fanselow — Oeiras 2 CH Round of 16

Oeiras 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Dino Prizmic
CRO
Dino Prizmic
#84ATP
1841ELO
1733Hard ELO
$530kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
GER
Sebastian Fanselow
#1187ATP
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Prizmic D.
2-6 6-2 6-2
Fanselow S.
Prizmic D.
2662
Fanselow S.
6221

Dino Prizmic defeated Sebastian Fanselow 2-6 6-2 6-2 in the Oeiras 2 CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Dino Prizmic came in ranked #84.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Prizmic D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Fanselow S.

Fanselow S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Prizmic D.

Serve advantage — Prizmic D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Prizmic D.Fanselow S.
34
Serve
—
20
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Prizmic D.Fanselow S.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (172 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Prizmic D.Fanselow S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
4
Break points saved·Dominant
92
31
Break points won·Dominant
64
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
22
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
37
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Prizmic D.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fanselow S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.2
Surface form
2.8
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
8.4
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Prizmic D.Fanselow S.
Freshness·
87
—

Prizmic D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Fils A.[4]
De Loore J.
6-17-64
Semi-finals
Fils A.[4]
Berankis R.[1]
7-56-3
De Loore J.
Herbert P.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
De Loore J.
Giustino L.
6-26-4
Fils A.[4]
Neuchrist M.
6-36-1
Berankis R.[1]
Prizmic D.
7-57-66
Herbert P.
Sousa P.
6-16-4
R16
Neuchrist M.
Oliveira G.
7-646-3
Giustino L.
Clarke J.[2]
6-37-64
De Loore J.
Collignon R.
6-46-3
Prizmic D.
Fanselow S.
2-66-26-2
Berankis R.[1]
Gerch L.
5-76-46-4
Herbert P.
Jianu F.
3-66-36-2
Fils A.[4]
Ilkel C.
7-56-2
Sousa P.
Martin Tiffon P.
3-67-56-4
R32
Gerch L.
Lajal M.
6-45-4
Prizmic D.
Karlovskiy E.
6-03-0
Neuchrist M.
Diez S.[8]
4-66-37-5
Clarke J.[2]
Faria J.
6-46-3
Collignon R.
Vacherot V.
7-56-4
De Loore J.
Medjedovic H.[5]
7-646-3
Jianu F.
Dougaz A.
6-47-5
Martin Tiffon P.
Decamps G.
7-616-756-4
Oliveira G.
Neumayer L.
6-26-2
Ilkel C.
Domingues J.
6-26-3
Fils A.[4]
Wessels L.
6-30-66-2
Fanselow S.
Mayot H.[6]
6-23-66-4
Berankis R.[1]
Valkusz M.
7-636-1
Herbert P.
Gigante M.
3-66-46-4
Giustino L.
Ejupovic E.
6-47-5
Sousa P.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[7]
7-636-3