Nuria Parrizas Diaz vs Mayar Sherif — Hobart Round of 32

Hobart · WTA · Round of 32
Nuria Parrizas Diaz
ESP
Nuria Parrizas Diaz
#626WTA
1398ELO
1400Hard ELO
34 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
Mayar Sherif
EGY
Mayar Sherif
#97WTA
1685ELO
1505Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWWWW
Parrizas Diaz N.
2-6 6-2 6-1
Sherif M.
Parrizas Diaz N.
2662
Sherif M.
6211

Nuria Parrizas Diaz defeated Mayar Sherif 2-6 6-2 6-1 in the Hobart round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Mayar Sherif came in ranked #97.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Parrizas Diaz N.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Sherif M.

Sherif M.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Parrizas Diaz N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Parrizas Diaz N.Sherif M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
73%
1st serve points won·Even
59%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
55%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
45%
Break points saved·Even
53%
57%
Aces / match·Even
1.4
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (144 vs 185). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Parrizas Diaz N.Sherif M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
35
67
Break points saved·Dominant
36
84
Break points won·Even
79
81
Deciding sets·Slight edge
64
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
31
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Parrizas Diaz N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Sherif M.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 105 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.3Hard Elo 1400
Surface ELO
5.7+105 Hard Elo edge
2.6Overall Elo 1398
ELO gap
7.4Overall Elo 1685
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
3.7
0.0
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Parrizas Diaz N.Sherif M.
Freshness·
—
58

Sherif M.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 115 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
20°CMainly clear
Wind 20 km/hHumidity 76%

Draw

Final
Davis L.
Cocciaretto E.
7-606-2
Semi-finals
Davis L.
Blinkova A.
6-36-3
Cocciaretto E.
Kenin S.
7-54-66-1
Quarter-finals
Cocciaretto E.
Pera B.[6]
5-77-686-4
Kenin S.
Kalinina A.[5]
4-66-36-1
Davis L.
Wang X.
6-36-3
Blinkova A.
Putintseva Y.[8]
6-36-4
R16
Kenin S.
Zanevska M.
6-26-3
Blinkova A.
Bouzkova M.[1]
7-56-4
Pera B.[6]
Siegemund L.
6-46-736-4
Cocciaretto E.
Paolini J.
6-26-1
Davis L.
Bonaventure Y.
7-616-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Maria T.
4-66-36-3
Wang X.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-54-66-3
Putintseva Y.[8]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-26-3
R32
Blinkova A.
Bronzetti L.
6-46-3
Putintseva Y.[8]
Liu C.
6-26-4
Davis L.
Stephens S.[4]
6-26-2
Bonaventure Y.
Zidansek T.
6-726-26-2
Kenin S.
Zhu L.
6-26-2
Cocciaretto E.
Cornet A.[3]
6-46-2
Maria T.
Gibson T.
6-36-2
Bouzkova M.[1]
Cristian J.
7-626-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Marino R.
6-26-1
Parrizas Diaz N.
Sherif M.
2-66-26-1
Zanevska M.
Mertens E.[2]
6-46-4
Wang X.
Gadecki O.
6-47-5
Siegemund L.
Martincova T.
5-76-16-2
Paolini J.
Tig P.
6-36-1
Pera B.[6]
Brengle M.
6-46-4
Van Uytvanck A.
Linette M.[7]
6-41-66-4