Lauren Davis vs Xin Yu Wang — Hobart Quarter-final

Hobart · WTA · Quarter-final
USA
Lauren Davis
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
CHN
Xin Yu Wang
1760ELO
1716Hard ELO
24 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
Davis L.
6-3 6-3
Wang X.
Davis L.
662
Wang X.
330

Lauren Davis defeated Xin Yu Wang 6-3 6-3 in the Hobart quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Davis L.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Wang X.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Serve advantage — Wang X.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Davis L.Wang X.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
40

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Davis L.Wang X.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
60%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
55%
58%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 178). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Davis L.Wang X.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
51
60
Break points saved·Dominant
26
86
Break points won·Even
79
78
Deciding sets·Even
86
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Davis L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Wang X.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
2.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
5.0
Country comfort
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
20°CMainly clear
Wind 20 km/hHumidity 76%

Draw

Final
Davis L.
Cocciaretto E.
7-606-2
Semi-finals
Davis L.
Blinkova A.
6-36-3
Cocciaretto E.
Kenin S.
7-54-66-1
Quarter-finals
Cocciaretto E.
Pera B.[6]
5-77-686-4
Kenin S.
Kalinina A.[5]
4-66-36-1
Davis L.
Wang X.
6-36-3
Blinkova A.
Putintseva Y.[8]
6-36-4
R16
Kenin S.
Zanevska M.
6-26-3
Blinkova A.
Bouzkova M.[1]
7-56-4
Pera B.[6]
Siegemund L.
6-46-736-4
Cocciaretto E.
Paolini J.
6-26-1
Davis L.
Bonaventure Y.
7-616-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Maria T.
4-66-36-3
Wang X.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-54-66-3
Putintseva Y.[8]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-26-3
R32
Blinkova A.
Bronzetti L.
6-46-3
Putintseva Y.[8]
Liu C.
6-26-4
Davis L.
Stephens S.[4]
6-26-2
Bonaventure Y.
Zidansek T.
6-726-26-2
Kenin S.
Zhu L.
6-26-2
Cocciaretto E.
Cornet A.[3]
6-46-2
Maria T.
Gibson T.
6-36-2
Bouzkova M.[1]
Cristian J.
7-626-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Marino R.
6-26-1
Parrizas Diaz N.
Sherif M.
2-66-26-1
Zanevska M.
Mertens E.[2]
6-46-4
Wang X.
Gadecki O.
6-47-5
Siegemund L.
Martincova T.
5-76-16-2
Paolini J.
Tig P.
6-36-1
Pera B.[6]
Brengle M.
6-46-4
Van Uytvanck A.
Linette M.[7]
6-41-66-4