Lauren Davis vs Sloane Stephens — Hobart Round of 32

Hobart · WTA · Round of 32
USA
Lauren Davis
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
Sloane Stephens
USA4
Sloane Stephens
#315WTA
1683ELO
1630Hard ELO
33 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLWL
Davis L.
6-2 6-2
Stephens S.
Davis L.
662
Stephens S.
220

Lauren Davis defeated Sloane Stephens 6-2 6-2 in the Hobart round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sloane Stephens came in leading the head-to-head 3–2. Lauren Davis narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.

Key context

Head to head

2–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-08-21ClevelandR32hardSloane Stephens1-6 6-3 6-1
2023-07-31WashingtonR32hardLauren Davis7-6(8) 3-6 6-1
2015-06-29WimbledonR64grassSloane Stephens6-4 6-4
2015-01-05AucklandR16hardLauren Davis1-6 6-4 6-1
2013-01-07HobartQFhardSloane Stephens6-3 4-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Davis L.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Stephens S.

Stephens S.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Davis L.Stephens S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
60%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
55%
56%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
51%
54%
Aces / match·Even
1.6
1.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 106). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Davis L.Stephens S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
63
Break points saved·Dominant
26
78
Break points won·Slight edge
79
90
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
55
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
82
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Davis L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Stephens S.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
5.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
5.0
Country comfort
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
20°CMainly clear
Wind 20 km/hHumidity 76%

Draw

Final
Davis L.
Cocciaretto E.
7-606-2
Semi-finals
Davis L.
Blinkova A.
6-36-3
Cocciaretto E.
Kenin S.
7-54-66-1
Quarter-finals
Cocciaretto E.
Pera B.[6]
5-77-686-4
Kenin S.
Kalinina A.[5]
4-66-36-1
Davis L.
Wang X.
6-36-3
Blinkova A.
Putintseva Y.[8]
6-36-4
R16
Kenin S.
Zanevska M.
6-26-3
Blinkova A.
Bouzkova M.[1]
7-56-4
Pera B.[6]
Siegemund L.
6-46-736-4
Cocciaretto E.
Paolini J.
6-26-1
Davis L.
Bonaventure Y.
7-616-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Maria T.
4-66-36-3
Wang X.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-54-66-3
Putintseva Y.[8]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-26-3
R32
Blinkova A.
Bronzetti L.
6-46-3
Putintseva Y.[8]
Liu C.
6-26-4
Davis L.
Stephens S.[4]
6-26-2
Bonaventure Y.
Zidansek T.
6-726-26-2
Kenin S.
Zhu L.
6-26-2
Cocciaretto E.
Cornet A.[3]
6-46-2
Maria T.
Gibson T.
6-36-2
Bouzkova M.[1]
Cristian J.
7-626-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Marino R.
6-26-1
Parrizas Diaz N.
Sherif M.
2-66-26-1
Zanevska M.
Mertens E.[2]
6-46-4
Wang X.
Gadecki O.
6-47-5
Siegemund L.
Martincova T.
5-76-16-2
Paolini J.
Tig P.
6-36-1
Pera B.[6]
Brengle M.
6-46-4
Van Uytvanck A.
Linette M.[7]
6-41-66-4