Bernarda Pera vs Madison Brengle — Hobart Round of 32

Hobart · WTA · Round of 32
Bernarda Pera
USA6
Bernarda Pera
#773WTA
1653ELO
1610Hard ELO
31 yrs · 175 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 January 2023
hard
Madison Brengle
USA
Madison Brengle
#210WTA
1575ELO
1539Hard ELO
36 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
Pera B.
6-4 6-4
Brengle M.
Pera B.
662
Brengle M.
440

Bernarda Pera defeated Madison Brengle 6-4 6-4 in the Hobart round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernarda Pera edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pera B.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Brengle M.

Brengle M.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Pera B.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pera B.Brengle M.
1st serve in·Clear edge
62%
77%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
56%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
44%
Service points won·Even
57%
53%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
49%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
51%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.3
0.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pera B.Brengle M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
7
Break points saved·Dominant
87
7
Break points won·Clear edge
79
98
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
46

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pera B.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Brengle M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+71 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Hard Elo 1539
6.1Overall Elo 1653
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1575
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.6
Surface form
3.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.3
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Country comfort
4.9
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Pera B.Brengle M.
Freshness·
—
82

Brengle M.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 55 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
20°CMainly clear
Wind 20 km/hHumidity 76%

Draw

Final
Davis L.
Cocciaretto E.
7-606-2
Semi-finals
Davis L.
Blinkova A.
6-36-3
Cocciaretto E.
Kenin S.
7-54-66-1
Quarter-finals
Cocciaretto E.
Pera B.[6]
5-77-686-4
Kenin S.
Kalinina A.[5]
4-66-36-1
Davis L.
Wang X.
6-36-3
Blinkova A.
Putintseva Y.[8]
6-36-4
R16
Kenin S.
Zanevska M.
6-26-3
Blinkova A.
Bouzkova M.[1]
7-56-4
Pera B.[6]
Siegemund L.
6-46-736-4
Cocciaretto E.
Paolini J.
6-26-1
Davis L.
Bonaventure Y.
7-616-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Maria T.
4-66-36-3
Wang X.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-54-66-3
Putintseva Y.[8]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-26-3
R32
Blinkova A.
Bronzetti L.
6-46-3
Putintseva Y.[8]
Liu C.
6-26-4
Davis L.
Stephens S.[4]
6-26-2
Bonaventure Y.
Zidansek T.
6-726-26-2
Kenin S.
Zhu L.
6-26-2
Cocciaretto E.
Cornet A.[3]
6-46-2
Maria T.
Gibson T.
6-36-2
Bouzkova M.[1]
Cristian J.
7-626-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Marino R.
6-26-1
Parrizas Diaz N.
Sherif M.
2-66-26-1
Zanevska M.
Mertens E.[2]
6-46-4
Wang X.
Gadecki O.
6-47-5
Siegemund L.
Martincova T.
5-76-16-2
Paolini J.
Tig P.
6-36-1
Pera B.[6]
Brengle M.
6-46-4
Van Uytvanck A.
Linette M.[7]
6-41-66-4