Aslan Karatsev vs Tim Van Rijthoven — Pune Round of 16

Pune · ATP · Round of 16
RUS8
Aslan Karatsev
#1285ATP
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 January 2023
hard
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Karatsev A.
7-6 7-6
Van Rijthoven T.
Karatsev A.
797102
Van Rijthoven T.
67680

Aslan Karatsev defeated Tim Van Rijthoven 7-6 7-6 in the Pune round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Aslan Karatsev came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Karatsev A.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Van Rijthoven T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Karatsev A.

Serve advantage — Karatsev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Karatsev A.Van Rijthoven T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
29%
Break points saved·Clear edge
61%
48%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.1
7.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (109 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Karatsev A.Van Rijthoven T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
43
26
Break points saved·Even
94
90
Break points won·Dominant
39
1
Deciding sets·Clear edge
37
19
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
41
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Karatsev A.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Van Rijthoven T.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.
Bonzi B.
4-67-56-3
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.
Karatsev A.[8]
7-646-1
Bonzi B.
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
7-656-756-1
Quarter-finals
Bonzi B.
Krajinovic F.[6]
7-656-4
Griekspoor T.
Cilic M.[1]
W/O
Karatsev A.[8]
Martinez P.
6-16-2
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Marterer M.
6-46-2
R16
Cilic M.[1]
Carballes Baena R.
6-33-66-1
Karatsev A.[8]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-677-68
Marterer M.
Djere L.
7-656-2
Griekspoor T.
Cecchinato M.
6-46-4
Martinez P.
Baez S.[4]
3-66-16-3
Krajinovic F.[6]
Mmoh M.
2-66-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Cobolli F.
7-56-4
Bonzi B.
Ruusuvuori E.[3]
6-17-64
R32
Carballes Baena R.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-17-5
Cecchinato M.
Basilashvili N.
6-26-2
Cobolli F.
Mukund S.
6-47-5
Krajinovic F.[6]
Nagal S.
6-44-66-4
Djere L.
Molcan A.[5]
6-26-4
Bonzi B.
Tseng C.
6-06-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Albot R.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.
Munar J.[7]
6-47-5
Martinez P.
Ramanathan R.
3-67-56-3
Marterer M.
Ymer E.
6-23-66-3
Mmoh M.
Dhamne M.
6-26-4
Karatsev A.[8]
Andujar P.
6-16-3