Marek Gengel vs Tennys Sandgren — Nonthaburi 1 CH Round of 32

Nonthaburi 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 January 2023
hard
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Gengel M.
6-4 6-7 6-1
Sandgren T.
Gengel M.
66462
Sandgren T.
47711

Marek Gengel defeated Tennys Sandgren 6-4 6-7 6-1 in the Nonthaburi 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Marek Gengel came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gengel M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Serve advantage — Sandgren T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gengel M.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
56%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
9.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (88 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gengel M.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
11
36
Break points saved·Dominant
35
92
Break points won·Slight edge
10
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gengel M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Sandgren T.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
6.7
0.0
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Novak D.[2]
Wu T.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Wu T.[3]
Harris L.
6-47-5
Novak D.[2]
Escoffier A.[4]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Escoffier A.[4]
Purcell M.[7]
6-27-68
Wu T.[3]
Donskoy E.
7-53-66-3
Harris L.
Hsu Y.[8]
6-776-36-4
Novak D.[2]
Gengel M.
6-36-756-3
R16
Novak D.[2]
Fonio G.
6-26-1
Gengel M.
Squire H.
6-46-3
Purcell M.[7]
Moraing M.
7-656-4
Donskoy E.
Ayeni O.
6-46-4
Wu T.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-747-56-4
Hsu Y.[8]
Kelly D.
6-26-2
Harris L.
Marozsan F.[1]
3-66-06-3
Escoffier A.[4]
Shimabukuro S.
2-67-666-3
R32
Hsu Y.[8]
Moriya H.
6-36-2
Marozsan F.[1]
Kovapitukted P.
6-36-3
Gengel M.
Sandgren T.
6-46-746-1
Shimabukuro S.
Zhukayev B.
6-43-66-4
Escoffier A.[4]
Mochizuki S.
6-46-756-2
Novak D.[2]
Added D.
6-26-2
Fonio G.
Tirante T.
5-77-637-67
Squire H.
Mager G.[5]
6-36-766-3
Purcell M.[7]
Travaglia S.
6-26-4
Donskoy E.
Jubb P.[6]
6-17-65
Ayeni O.
Royer V.
6-43-66-2
Uchiyama Y.
Jones M.
6-46-4
Kelly D.
Trungelliti M.
7-56-2
Harris L.
Hassan B.
6-27-5
Moraing M.
Pouille L.
7-56-756-3
Wu T.[3]
Suksumrarn T.
6-46-1