Giovanni Fonio vs Stuart Parker — Nonthaburi 1 CH Qualifying Round 2

Nonthaburi 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
ITA11
Giovanni Fonio
#910ATP
1349ELO
1350Hard ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 January 2023
hard
GBR6
Stuart Parker
#766ATP
1434ELO
1412Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWLW
Fonio G.
6-1 6-4
Parker S.
Fonio G.
662
Parker S.
140

Giovanni Fonio defeated Stuart Parker 6-1 6-4 in the Nonthaburi 1 CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fonio G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Parker S.

Parker S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fonio G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fonio G.Parker S.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fonio G.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Parker S.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1350
Surface ELO
5.8+63 Hard Elo edge
3.9Overall Elo 1349
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1434
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
7.3
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Ayeni O.
Nam J.
6-36-4
Fonio G.[11]
Parker S.[6]
6-16-4
Donskoy E.[9]
Vrbensky M.[4]
7-56-4
Squire H.[3]
Santillan A.[10]
6-46-4
Pouille L.[8]
Perez A.
7-636-2
Ayeni O.
Nam J.
6-36-4
Kelly D.
Gaio F.[12]
7-656-3
Q1
Nam J.
Ovcharenko O.[7]
6-36-1
Pouille L.[8]
Berrettini J.
7-57-5
Vrbensky M.[4]
Clark E.
4-66-46-4
Kelly D.
Fomin S.[5]
6-14-66-2
Fonio G.[11]
Kumar O.
7-56-2
Donskoy E.[9]
Kunsuwan N.
6-36-3
Ayeni O.
Oradini G.[1]
6-36-3
Santillan A.[10]
Rosenkranz M.
6-26-2
Squire H.[3]
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-46-3
Perez A.
Harris B.[2]
6-47-66
Nam J.
Ovcharenko O.
6-36-1
Parker S.[6]
Samrej K.
6-26-3
Gaio F.[12]
Chaiyarin C.
6-25-76-3