Antoine Escoffier vs Max Purcell — Nonthaburi 1 CH Quarter-final

Nonthaburi 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
FRA4
Antoine Escoffier
#581ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 January 2023
hard
AUS7
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Escoffier A.
6-2 7-6
Purcell M.
Escoffier A.
67102
Purcell M.
2680

Antoine Escoffier defeated Max Purcell 6-2 7-6 in the Nonthaburi 1 CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escoffier A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Purcell M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escoffier A.Purcell M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
7.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escoffier A.Purcell M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
59
Break points saved·Clear edge
68
92
Break points won·Slight edge
18
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
11
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escoffier A.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Purcell M.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
8.1
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Novak D.[2]
Wu T.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Wu T.[3]
Harris L.
6-47-5
Novak D.[2]
Escoffier A.[4]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Escoffier A.[4]
Purcell M.[7]
6-27-68
Wu T.[3]
Donskoy E.
7-53-66-3
Harris L.
Hsu Y.[8]
6-776-36-4
Novak D.[2]
Gengel M.
6-36-756-3
R16
Novak D.[2]
Fonio G.
6-26-1
Gengel M.
Squire H.
6-46-3
Purcell M.[7]
Moraing M.
7-656-4
Donskoy E.
Ayeni O.
6-46-4
Wu T.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-747-56-4
Hsu Y.[8]
Kelly D.
6-26-2
Harris L.
Marozsan F.[1]
3-66-06-3
Escoffier A.[4]
Shimabukuro S.
2-67-666-3
R32
Hsu Y.[8]
Moriya H.
6-36-2
Marozsan F.[1]
Kovapitukted P.
6-36-3
Gengel M.
Sandgren T.
6-46-746-1
Shimabukuro S.
Zhukayev B.
6-43-66-4
Escoffier A.[4]
Mochizuki S.
6-46-756-2
Novak D.[2]
Added D.
6-26-2
Fonio G.
Tirante T.
5-77-637-67
Squire H.
Mager G.[5]
6-36-766-3
Purcell M.[7]
Travaglia S.
6-26-4
Donskoy E.
Jubb P.[6]
6-17-65
Ayeni O.
Royer V.
6-43-66-2
Uchiyama Y.
Jones M.
6-46-4
Kelly D.
Trungelliti M.
7-56-2
Harris L.
Hassan B.
6-27-5
Moraing M.
Pouille L.
7-56-756-3
Wu T.[3]
Suksumrarn T.
6-46-1