Tallon Griekspoor vs Marin Cilic — Pune Quarter-final

Pune · ATP · Quarter-final
Tallon Griekspoor
NED
Tallon Griekspoor
#57ATP
1789ELO
1777Hard ELO
$970kYTD
$8.1MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLW
—
Sets
Walkover
Monday, 2 January 2023
hard
Marin Cilic
CRO1
Marin Cilic
#88ATP
1800ELO
1762Hard ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
Griekspoor T.
vs
Cilic M.

Tallon Griekspoor advanced past Marin Cilic via walkover in the Pune quarter-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Griekspoor T.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Cilic M.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Griekspoor T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Griekspoor T.Cilic M.
51
Serve
57
0
Return
10

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Griekspoor T.Cilic M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
66%
Return points won·Even
33%
35%
Break points saved·Even
65%
68%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.6
9.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Griekspoor T.Cilic M.
Clutch Rating·Even
76
76
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Slight edge
34
41
Deciding sets·Even
94
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
97
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Griekspoor T.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 41 days (−0.7)
Cilic M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 38 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.3+15 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Hard Elo 1762
5.1Overall Elo 1789
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1800
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.0
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Griekspoor T.Cilic M.
Freshness·Even
96
100

Griekspoor T.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Cilic M.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.
Bonzi B.
4-67-56-3
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.
Karatsev A.[8]
7-646-1
Bonzi B.
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
7-656-756-1
Quarter-finals
Bonzi B.
Krajinovic F.[6]
7-656-4
Griekspoor T.
Cilic M.[1]
W/O
Karatsev A.[8]
Martinez P.
6-16-2
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Marterer M.
6-46-2
R16
Cilic M.[1]
Carballes Baena R.
6-33-66-1
Karatsev A.[8]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-677-68
Marterer M.
Djere L.
7-656-2
Griekspoor T.
Cecchinato M.
6-46-4
Martinez P.
Baez S.[4]
3-66-16-3
Krajinovic F.[6]
Mmoh M.
2-66-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Cobolli F.
7-56-4
Bonzi B.
Ruusuvuori E.[3]
6-17-64
R32
Carballes Baena R.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-17-5
Cecchinato M.
Basilashvili N.
6-26-2
Cobolli F.
Mukund S.
6-47-5
Krajinovic F.[6]
Nagal S.
6-44-66-4
Djere L.
Molcan A.[5]
6-26-4
Bonzi B.
Tseng C.
6-06-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Albot R.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.
Munar J.[7]
6-47-5
Martinez P.
Ramanathan R.
3-67-56-3
Marterer M.
Ymer E.
6-23-66-3
Mmoh M.
Dhamne M.
6-26-4
Karatsev A.[8]
Andujar P.
6-16-3