Cem Ilkel vs Ricardas Berankis — Oeiras 1 CH Round of 16

Oeiras 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 January 2023
hard
LTU1
Ricardas Berankis
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Ilkel C.
6-2 5-7 7-6
Berankis R.
Ilkel C.
65772
Berankis R.
27631

Cem Ilkel defeated Ricardas Berankis 6-2 5-7 7-6 in the Oeiras 1 CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Cem Ilkel came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Cem Ilkel extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in three sets, 6–2 5–7 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-01-06DohaR32hardCem Ilkel6-2 4-6 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Berankis R.

Berankis R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve advantage — Berankis R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Berankis R.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 147). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Berankis R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
58
Break points saved·Dominant
49
91
Break points won·Clear edge
3
16
Deciding sets·Slight edge
70
80
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Berankis R.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
8.2
Surface form
6.0
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
De Loore J.
Jianu F.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
De Loore J.
Ilkel C.
6-43-67-67
Jianu F.
Collignon R.[8]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Jianu F.
Neuchrist M.[6]
6-37-64
Collignon R.[8]
Leshem E.
6-47-5
De Loore J.
Prizmic D.
6-46-3
Ilkel C.
Debru G.
6-16-2
R16
Neuchrist M.[6]
Domingues J.
6-37-67
Collignon R.[8]
Giustino L.
6-27-65
Jianu F.
Medjedovic H.[4]
6-26-3
De Loore J.
Oliveira G.
6-46-4
Debru G.
Ejupovic E.
6-34-67-5
Ilkel C.
Berankis R.[1]
6-25-77-63
Leshem E.
Clarke J.[2]
3-66-36-2
Prizmic D.
Gigante M.
2-66-16-3
R32
Gigante M.
Tabur C.
6-37-5
Medjedovic H.[4]
Gerch L.
6-46-3
Debru G.
Valkusz M.[7]
2-66-17-5
Leshem E.
Kachmazov A.
6-46-4
Giustino L.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-13-66-3
Collignon R.[8]
Faria J.
6-16-1
Jianu F.
Lajal M.
3-66-37-65
Domingues J.
Vacherot V.
1-66-46-1
Neuchrist M.[6]
Neumayer L.
7-57-63
De Loore J.
Dougaz A.[5]
6-27-68
Oliveira G.
Wessels L.
6-37-67
Ejupovic E.
Sousa P.
6-37-5
Ilkel C.
De Schepper K.
4-66-26-4
Berankis R.[1]
Moroni G.
2-66-17-5
Prizmic D.
Herbert P.
7-56-1
Clarke J.[2]
Decamps G.
7-646-1