Irina Camelia Begu vs Shelby Rogers — Adelaide 1 Round of 32

Adelaide 1 · WTA · Round of 32
Irina Camelia Begu
ROU
Irina Camelia Begu
#173WTA
1769ELO
1686Hard ELO
35 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 January 2023
hard
USA
Shelby Rogers
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
Begu I.
3-6 7-6 6-1
Rogers S.
Begu I.
37762
Rogers S.
66511

Irina Camelia Begu defeated Shelby Rogers 3-6 7-6 6-1 in the Adelaide 1 round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Shelby Rogers came in leading the head-to-head 2–1, defending last year's quarter-final. Irina Camelia Begu narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-04-24MadridR32clayIrina Camelia Begu7-5 6-2
2021-10-06Indian WellsR32hardShelby Rogers6-0 6-2
2016-05-23Roland GarrosR16clayShelby Rogers6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Begu I.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rogers S.

Rogers S.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Begu I.

Serve advantage — Begu I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Begu I.Rogers S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
49%
Service points won·Even
56%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
46%
40%
Break points saved·Even
55%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (96 vs 43). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Begu I.Rogers S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
42
Break points saved·Dominant
58
86
Break points won·Even
88
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
88
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Begu I.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 98 days (−1.5)
Rogers S.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 91 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
4.0
Surface form
5.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Begu I.Rogers S.
Freshness·
98
—

Begu I.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sabalenka A.[2]
Noskova L.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Sabalenka A.[2]
Begu I.
6-36-2
Noskova L.
Jabeur O.[1]
6-31-66-3
Quarter-finals
Sabalenka A.[2]
Vondrousova M.
6-37-5
Begu I.
Kudermetova V.[4]
7-56-4
Jabeur O.[1]
Kostyuk M.
7-657-5
Noskova L.
Azarenka V.
6-46-737-66
R16
Azarenka V.
Zheng Q.
6-27-5
Jabeur O.[1]
Cirstea S.
7-636-1
Noskova L.
Liu C.
6-26-2
Vondrousova M.
Kanepi K.
6-06-4
Begu I.
Ostapenko J.[7]
6-36-0
Sabalenka A.[2]
Samsonova L.
7-687-63
Kostyuk M.
Rybakina E.
6-756-26-3
Kudermetova V.[4]
Andreescu B.
6-46-0
R32
Andreescu B.
Muguruza G.
0-67-636-1
Noskova L.
Kasatkina D.[3]
6-36-726-3
Azarenka V.
Kalinina A.
7-697-65
Liu C.
Hon P.
4-66-36-3
Zheng Q.
Kontaveit A.[6]
6-14-67-67
Samsonova L.
Zhang S.
5-76-36-0
Begu I.
Rogers S.
3-67-656-1
Cirstea S.
Golubic V.
6-07-61
Vondrousova M.
Alexandrova E.[8]
4-66-36-2
Kudermetova V.[4]
Anisimova A.
6-36-0
Rybakina E.
Collins D.[5]
5-76-26-3
Kostyuk M.
Fourlis J.
6-13-66-4
Ostapenko J.[7]
Pliskova K.
6-16-3
Kanepi K.
Sasnovich A.
4-66-16-4