Vitaliy Sachko vs Tomas Machac — Andria CH Quarter-final

Andria CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Vitaliy Sachko
UKR
Vitaliy Sachko
#195ATP
1584ELO
1475Hard ELO
$158kYTD
$835kCAREER
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 November 2022
hard
Tomas Machac
CZE3
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Sachko V.
7-5 6-2
Machac T.
Sachko V.
762
Machac T.
520

Vitaliy Sachko defeated Tomas Machac 7-5 6-2 in the Andria CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sachko V.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sachko V.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Sachko V.Machac T.
—
Serve
30
—
Return
25

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Sachko V.Machac T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
54%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sachko V.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
90
Break points saved·Clear edge
81
98
Break points won·Dominant
48
80
Deciding sets·Clear edge
76
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
19
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sachko V.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Machac T.
8.0
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.3Hard Elo 1475
Surface ELO
9.7+354 Hard Elo edge
1.0Overall Elo 1584
ELO gap
9.0Overall Elo 1866
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
7.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
1.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sachko V.Machac T.
Freshness·
83
—

Sachko V.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Riedi L.
Kukushkin M.
7-646-3
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.
Fucsovics M.[1]
6-46-4
Riedi L.
Sachko V.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kukushkin M.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-07-5
Riedi L.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-1
Sachko V.
Machac T.[3]
7-56-2
Fucsovics M.[1]
Travaglia S.
4-66-47-5
R16
Machac T.[3]
Svrcina D.
W/O
Sachko V.
Sels J.[7]
2-1
Karlovskiy E.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-27-5
Riedi L.
Haase R.
7-56-1
Rodionov J.[5]
Kachmazov A.
6-46-746-4
Kukushkin M.
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Travaglia S.
Paulson A.
6-37-66
Fucsovics M.[1]
Peniston R.
7-636-756-3
R32
Svrcina D.
Bellucci M.
4-67-694-2
Riedi L.
Gaston H.[2]
7-627-64
Rodionov J.[5]
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-4
Karlovskiy E.
Vukic A.
6-36-766-4
Bergs Z.[8]
Ferrari G.
6-33-66-2
Machac T.[3]
Cobolli F.
7-636-2
Sachko V.
Lazarov A.
3-66-36-2
Fucsovics M.[1]
Fils A.
6-47-65
Paulson A.
Erhard M.
6-36-2
Kachmazov A.
Marchenko I.
6-26-1
Sels J.[7]
Vatutin A.
6-16-3
Haase R.
Zuk K.
6-26-4
Geerts M.
Parker S.
1-66-37-64
Kukushkin M.
Poljak D.
6-46-4
Travaglia S.
Ymer E.[6]
7-57-65
Peniston R.
Clarke J.
6-26-1