Nicolas Kicker vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Temuco CH Round of 16

Temuco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Nicolas Kicker
ARG8
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1345Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 November 2022
hard
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1359Hard ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Kicker N.
3-6 6-4 6-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Kicker N.
3662
Reis Da Silva J.
6431

Nicolas Kicker defeated Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 3-6 6-4 6-3 in the Temuco CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kicker N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kicker N.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.1
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kicker N.Reis Da Silva J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
12
Break points saved·Slight edge
56
49
Break points won·Even
45
43
Deciding sets·Clear edge
30
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kicker N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Reis Da Silva J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
4.7Hard Elo 1345
Surface ELO
5.3+14 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1385
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1486
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
5.5
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kicker N.Reis Da Silva J.
Freshness·
100
—

Kicker N.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Andreozzi G.
Kicker N.[8]
4-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Andreozzi G.
Gomez E.[2]
3-67-56-1
Kicker N.[8]
Mejia N.
6-26-716-3
Quarter-finals
Andreozzi G.
Otegui J.
6-16-1
Gomez E.[2]
Olivo R.[7]
6-33-66-2
Kicker N.[8]
Bagnis F.[1]
6-06-2
Mejia N.
Hardt N.
6-716-46-4
R16
Gomez E.[2]
Farjat T.
6-17-5
Mejia N.
Lock B.
6-46-3
Hardt N.
Ayeni O.
6-33-67-5
Bagnis F.[1]
Torres J.
6-36-2
Otegui J.
Decamps G.
7-676-4
Kicker N.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
3-66-46-3
Andreozzi G.
Tirante T.
7-646-776-4
Olivo R.[7]
Domingues J.
6-27-61
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Galarza J.
6-45-76-3
Bagnis F.[1]
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-26-0
Ayeni O.
Navone M.
7-666-4
Gomez E.[2]
Paz J.
6-46-3
Farjat T.
Villanueva G.
6-36-4
Domingues J.
Bicknell B.
6-46-2
Olivo R.[7]
Zeballos F.
7-51-66-2
Otegui J.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-56-2
Decamps G.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Andreozzi G.
Mena F.[6]
2-67-606-2
Lock B.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
7-636-2
Mejia N.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-1
Hardt N.
Bruna N.
6-16-3
Kicker N.[8]
Alvarez N.
6-27-5
Tirante T.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-35-3
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-02-1