Gabriel Decamps vs Wilson Leite — Temuco CH Round of 32

Temuco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BRA
Gabriel Decamps
26 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 November 2022
hard
BRA
Wilson Leite
#750ATP
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Decamps G.
6-3 6-0
Leite W.
Decamps G.
662
Leite W.
300

Gabriel Decamps defeated Wilson Leite 6-3 6-0 in the Temuco CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Decamps G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Leite W.

Leite W.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Decamps G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Decamps G.Leite W.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
1.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.6
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 145). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Decamps G.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Leite W.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
0.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
6.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Decamps G.Leite W.
Freshness·
—
100

Leite W.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Andreozzi G.
Kicker N.[8]
4-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Andreozzi G.
Gomez E.[2]
3-67-56-1
Kicker N.[8]
Mejia N.
6-26-716-3
Quarter-finals
Andreozzi G.
Otegui J.
6-16-1
Gomez E.[2]
Olivo R.[7]
6-33-66-2
Kicker N.[8]
Bagnis F.[1]
6-06-2
Mejia N.
Hardt N.
6-716-46-4
R16
Gomez E.[2]
Farjat T.
6-17-5
Mejia N.
Lock B.
6-46-3
Hardt N.
Ayeni O.
6-33-67-5
Bagnis F.[1]
Torres J.
6-36-2
Otegui J.
Decamps G.
7-676-4
Kicker N.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
3-66-46-3
Andreozzi G.
Tirante T.
7-646-776-4
Olivo R.[7]
Domingues J.
6-27-61
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Galarza J.
6-45-76-3
Bagnis F.[1]
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-26-0
Ayeni O.
Navone M.
7-666-4
Gomez E.[2]
Paz J.
6-46-3
Farjat T.
Villanueva G.
6-36-4
Domingues J.
Bicknell B.
6-46-2
Olivo R.[7]
Zeballos F.
7-51-66-2
Otegui J.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-56-2
Decamps G.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Andreozzi G.
Mena F.[6]
2-67-606-2
Lock B.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
7-636-2
Mejia N.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-1
Hardt N.
Bruna N.
6-16-3
Kicker N.[8]
Alvarez N.
6-27-5
Tirante T.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-35-3
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-02-1