Facundo Bagnis vs Tomas Lipovsek Puches — Temuco CH Round of 32

Temuco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG1
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1513Hard ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 November 2022
hard
ARG
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
Bagnis F.
6-2 6-0
Lipovsek Puches T.
Bagnis F.
662
Lipovsek Puches T.
200

Facundo Bagnis defeated Tomas Lipovsek Puches 6-2 6-0 in the Temuco CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Lipovsek Puches T.

Lipovsek Puches T.serving54% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Lipovsek Puches T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
69%
57%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
51%
37%
Service points won·Clear edge
62%
50%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Clear edge
62%
49%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.6
1.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Lipovsek Puches T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
6
Break points saved·Dominant
92
3
Break points won·Slight edge
35
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
34
Tiebreaks·
3
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bagnis F.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lipovsek Puches T.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
4.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
9.1
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Andreozzi G.
Kicker N.[8]
4-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Andreozzi G.
Gomez E.[2]
3-67-56-1
Kicker N.[8]
Mejia N.
6-26-716-3
Quarter-finals
Andreozzi G.
Otegui J.
6-16-1
Gomez E.[2]
Olivo R.[7]
6-33-66-2
Kicker N.[8]
Bagnis F.[1]
6-06-2
Mejia N.
Hardt N.
6-716-46-4
R16
Gomez E.[2]
Farjat T.
6-17-5
Mejia N.
Lock B.
6-46-3
Hardt N.
Ayeni O.
6-33-67-5
Bagnis F.[1]
Torres J.
6-36-2
Otegui J.
Decamps G.
7-676-4
Kicker N.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
3-66-46-3
Andreozzi G.
Tirante T.
7-646-776-4
Olivo R.[7]
Domingues J.
6-27-61
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Galarza J.
6-45-76-3
Bagnis F.[1]
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-26-0
Ayeni O.
Navone M.
7-666-4
Gomez E.[2]
Paz J.
6-46-3
Farjat T.
Villanueva G.
6-36-4
Domingues J.
Bicknell B.
6-46-2
Olivo R.[7]
Zeballos F.
7-51-66-2
Otegui J.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-56-2
Decamps G.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Andreozzi G.
Mena F.[6]
2-67-606-2
Lock B.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
7-636-2
Mejia N.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-1
Hardt N.
Bruna N.
6-16-3
Kicker N.[8]
Alvarez N.
6-27-5
Tirante T.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-35-3
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-02-1