Christopher Oconnell vs Marc Polmans — Kobe CH Quarter-final

Kobe CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS1
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 November 2022
hard
Marc Polmans
AUS
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWL
Oconnell C.
7-5 7-6
Polmans M.
Oconnell C.
7772
Polmans M.
5630

Christopher Oconnell defeated Marc Polmans 7-5 7-6 in the Kobe CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Polmans M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Polmans M.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Polmans M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.1
4.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 182). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Polmans M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
79
Break points won·Clear edge
22
10
Deciding sets·Slight edge
38
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Oconnell C.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Polmans M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.0+243 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.0Hard Elo 1414
7.7Overall Elo 1673
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1449
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
9.3
Surface form
7.2
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
5.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Oconnell C.Polmans M.
Freshness·
—
100

Polmans M.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Watanuki Y.[7]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-737-56-4
Semi-finals
Watanuki Y.[7]
Oconnell C.[1]
6-47-66
Ferreira Silva F.
Serdarusic N.
6-43-66-3
Quarter-finals
Oconnell C.[1]
Polmans M.
7-57-63
Watanuki Y.[7]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-1
Serdarusic N.
Millman J.[2]
7-627-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Hazawa S.
2-66-37-64
R16
Millman J.[2]
Imai S.
6-16-4
Serdarusic N.
Dzumhur D.[6]
4-66-16-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Hijikata R.[3]
6-46-2
Hazawa S.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-4
Watanuki Y.[7]
Shimabukuro S.
6-46-2
Ramanathan R.
Jung J.
2-66-04-0
Polmans M.
Kolar Z.
6-16-4
Oconnell C.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-26-756-1
R32
Kolar Z.
Ito T.
6-32-0
Shimabukuro S.
Uchiyama Y.
5-1
Oconnell C.[1]
Sinclair C.
6-777-6107-63
Imai S.
Moriya H.
6-46-3
Serdarusic N.
Ionel N.
6-36-776-2
Hijikata R.[3]
Sweeny D.
6-31-66-2
Hazawa S.
Duckworth J.[5]
6-46-4
Jung J.
Noguchi R.
3-66-46-1
Zhukayev B.
Sugita Y.
4-66-46-4
Millman J.[2]
Jianu F.
6-33-66-4
Watanuki Y.[7]
Chung Y.
6-26-2
Dzumhur D.[6]
Ichikawa T.
6-46-3
Polmans M.
Tu L.[8]
6-736-26-3
Ramanathan R.
Uchida K.[4]
6-44-66-3
Nakagawa N.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Ly N.
6-26-4