Leandro Riedi vs Maximilian Marterer — Helsinki CH Round of 16

Helsinki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Leandro Riedi
SUI
Leandro Riedi
#134ATP
1693ELO
1675Hard ELO
$193kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 November 2022
hard
GER
Maximilian Marterer
31 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
Riedi L.
7-6 6-2
Marterer M.
Riedi L.
7762
Marterer M.
6520

Leandro Riedi defeated Maximilian Marterer 7-6 6-2 in the Helsinki CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Maximilian Marterer came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Leandro Riedi closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Riedi L.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Marterer M.

Marterer M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Riedi L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Riedi L.Marterer M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (173 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Riedi L.Marterer M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
63
47
Break points saved·Even
94
93
Break points won·Even
14
13
Deciding sets·Clear edge
85
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Riedi L.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marterer M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
5.8
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Riedi L.
Machac T.[5]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Machac T.[5]
Hanfmann Y.
6-16-2
Riedi L.
Sels J.[8]
6-36-756-4
Quarter-finals
Machac T.[5]
Bergs Z.
6-16-2
Sels J.[8]
Andreev A.
6-36-4
Riedi L.
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-2
Hanfmann Y.
Kukushkin M.
6-46-1
R16
Machac T.[5]
Virtanen O.
6-46-2
Riedi L.
Marterer M.
7-656-2
Kuzmanov D.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-3
Hanfmann Y.
Peniston R.
6-36-4
Sels J.[8]
Brancaccio R.
4-66-36-2
Andreev A.
Bellucci M.
7-53-67-62
Kukushkin M.
Karlovskiy E.
6-24-2
Bergs Z.
Shevchenko A.
6-43-67-62
R32
Celikbilek A.
Kotov P.[1]
7-677-65
Brancaccio R.
Laaksonen H.
6-36-3
Kukushkin M.
Travaglia S.
6-26-4
Sels J.[8]
Kopriva V.
6-36-756-3
Marterer M.
Ymer E.[7]
6-17-66
Karlovskiy E.
Ritschard A.
7-676-3
Shevchenko A.
Krutykh O.
6-26-3
Bergs Z.
Van Rijthoven T.[3]
7-696-1
Bellucci M.
Gombos N.[4]
4-67-636-1
Riedi L.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-16-4
Peniston R.
Saatela L.
6-06-4
Machac T.[5]
Kachmazov A.
7-646-4
Kuzmanov D.
Gaston H.
6-36-3
Andreev A.
Clarke J.
6-13-67-62
Virtanen O.
Lofman A.
6-17-5
Hanfmann Y.
Andujar P.[6]
6-36-4